Title 18 of the United States Code – Wikipedia

United States criminal code
Title 18 of the United States Code is the main criminal code of the union government of the United States. [ 1 ] The Title deals with union crimes and criminal routine. In its coverage, Title 18 is similar to most U.S. state criminal codes, which typically are referred to by such names as Penal Code, Criminal Code, or Crimes Code. [ 2 ] Typical of state criminal codes is the California Penal Code. [ 3 ] many U.S. state criminal codes, unlike the federal Title 18, are based on the Model Penal Code promulgated by the american english Law Institute .

partially I—Crimes [edit ]

Chapters 1–10 [edit ]

Chapter 2 : Aircraft and Motor Vehicles [edit ]

This chapter deals with arson. It has only one part.

  • Section 81, which defines “arson”, “attempted arson”, or “conspiracy to commit arson”, and provides a penalty of imprisonment for up to 25 years, the greater of the fine under this title or the cost of repairing or replacing any property that is damaged or destroyed, or both. It also provides that if the building is a dwelling or if the life of any person is placed in jeopardy, the penalty shall be a fine under this title, imprisonment for “any term of years or for life”, or both.

This chapter deals with assail.

Chapters 11–123 [edit ]

Part II—Criminal procedure [edit ]

separate III—Prisons and Prisoners [edit ]

Part IV—Correction of Youthful Offenders [edit ]

Part V—Immunity of Witnesses [edit ]

  • Chapter 601: Immunity of Witnesses

This legislative act covers a specific way to satisfy the Fifth Amendment ( good to silence as a form of protection against self-incrimination ) to the Constitution, but still force witnesses to testify. Basically, if a witness—whether in a federal court such as a United States District Court or in testimony before a congressional subcommittee—refuses to answer questions and pleads the 5th, the presiding military officer can use the provisions of Title 18 chapter 601 to forcibly compel the witness to answer the questions. Since this would violate the 5th amendment rights of the witness, the codified requires that the presiding officer must compulsorily preserve those rights, by guaranteeing the witness immunity from pursuance for anything they might truthfully say under such compulsion. ( The witness is being compelled to answer the questions truthfully—if they lie, they can be tried in court for perjury, but deoxyadenosine monophosphate long as they tell the truth, they are immune from being personally prosecuted for anything they might say—which is the reverse of the common situation, where anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. )

actually giving a especial witness guaranteed immunity as a means to compelling their testimony is reasonably byzantine ; the details of how it is done deviate depending on the particular branch of government hearing the testimony. If the witness is testifying before an representation ( includes Army/Navy/AirForce/VA/DOD/HomeSec/StateDept, FCC/FTC, DOT/NTSB, DOE/NRC/COP/DeptOfTheInterior, SEC/CFTC/FedBoard/FDIC, NLRB/LaborDept/CommerceDept/AgDept, DOJ/Treasury, and many others ), the presiding officer for the agency needs approval from the federal Attorney General before they can grant a witness immunity and compel testimony. In court cases, the federal zone lawyer ( for the particular federal district woo which has jurisdiction in the case ) needs approval from either the union lawyer general directly or from a particular set of the federal lawyer general ‘s underlings. In the shell of testimony before congress, the body hearing the testimony must vote on whether or not to give immunity as a mean to compel testimony, before getting a federal district woo to issue to compulsion regulate ; for a subcommittee, two-thirds of the full membership must vote affirmative, whereas for testimony before an integral house of congress a childlike majority of members confront voting affirmative is acceptable. Although congress must notify the federal lawyer general 10 days in gain of submitting their request for compulsion to the federal zone woo, the AG can not veto the order ( but they can at their option instruct the federal zone court to delay issuing the compulsion order for a period up to 20 days entire ) .

See besides [edit ]

References [edit ]

Rate this post

Bài viết liên quan

Theo dõi
Thông báo của
guest
0 Comments
Phản hồi nội tuyến
Xem tất cả bình luận