—The Great Pyramid of Egypt has stood proudly for thousands of years, one of the most well-studied ancient enigmas on Earth.
In the past three decades, the latest technology has assisted the experts in uncovering some startling new revelations. Hidden corridors and voids have been detected with georadar, small closed doors discovered with the help of state-of-the-art robotic explorers, and less than a decade ago, two mysterious voids were found with the help of cosmic ray muon scanning technology.
But whilst the world waits for what happens next, a mystery from history has come to light. Buried in books nearly 200 years old, are some previously unseen, credible historic eyewitness accounts, accounts that contradict what we thought we knew about the history of the Great Pyramid.
Can they help us unlock a secret chamber hidden deep inside? is there a corridor below the Queen’s Chamber? Was its discovery covered-up more than 150 years ago?
In this video the Great Pyramid mystery only deepens as two startling eye witness accounts from 1837 could well change the narrative.
*VIDEO CONTENTS*
0:00 – Intro
1:50 – Previous Videos
3:21 – Howard Vyse Excavations
4:39 – Author Stefan Bergdoll
6:13 – New Eyewitness Accounts
6:49 – Visino’s Visit to the pyramid
12:34 – Count Puckler’s pyramid visit
14:53 – Was There a Second Sarcophagus?
20:35 – A Secret Chamber?
30:09 – 12 Key Points
33:41 – Closing Remarks
With special thanks to author, Stefan Bergdoll. His books are available from
And thanks to History for Granite. Subscribe to his channel at
Special thanks to Anyextee for allowing me to use his video footage. Subscribe to his channel at
And thanks to Bales for allowing me to use video footage. Subscribe at
All images are taken from Google Images and the below sources for educational purposes only. Please subscribe to Ancient Architects, Like the video and please leave a comment below. Thank you.
Sources:
J. N. Visino Book:
Prince Puckler Book:
Vyse, Operations Vol. 1:
Vyse, Operations Vol. 2:
#AncientArchitects #GreatPyramid #ancientegypt
Watch more new videos about Archeology | Synthesized by Mindovermetal English
Thank you for watching and for being here! If you want to support the channel, you can become a YouTube Member at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCscI4NOggNSN-Si5QgErNCw/join or I’m on Patreon at http://www.patreon.com/ancientarchitects
Absolutely AWFUL voiceover.
I don't buy the sarcofagus explanation you do. Yet it could be that some rubble from the excavation had a similar form or was positioned in a way that resembled a sarcophagus.
It seems the sarcophagus was either taken away or destroyed in order to excavate underneath it. More importantly, what is under that rubbish pile?
Why were they called the Kings and Queens chamber? Who decided on those titles?
So who has the final say so on during more excavation of the great pyramid?
I find it highly unlikely that two separate individuals would mistake the floor of a tunnel excavation as a sarcophagus, the latter of which is a free-standing structure in every single instance that I can recall in my mind. These guys just traveled through hundreds of feed of tunnel–I think that they would be well acquainted with the difference between a tunnel and a sarcophagus.
Of course, if they both did make that same mistake, it makes me wonder how accurate the rest of their descriptions and claims are.
Is there anything to report? Can someone timestamp the new chamber or whatever it is that’s been discovered ?
Thx for going back to the old style of video much better!!!
Queens chembaaaaaaa
zagi s a shill. he openly lies and been proven so often he s a follow our script puppet a disgrace to history
Very interesting and thank you and History for Granite's work.
I have already been subscribed to his channel for a little while, I find that he gives an excellent well reasoned and expert appraisal.
Both Ancient Architects and History for Granite are great channels not of pure speculation (although an open mind is always good) but rather fact finding and if there is to be any speculation then it is also balanced with known facts. unlke some other alternative history channels.
Well done 👌
always love your videos
If it had already been excavated once it should not be hard to do it again. Why don't they just dig it out? From what I have understood, most of any continuing work on the pyramids was obstructed by Hawass but he is no longer in charge, right? also the tunnel in the niche looks to me to have been intended as a crypt. Possibly once holding a coffin but now empty, was misinterpeted as a tunnel or passage.
Why are you talking in rhymes?
This is unlistenable…
The Queen’s Chambaaaaaaaaar….
Hawass has little ethics. First, he dismiss any claim… then, years later, he announces the claim as if he was the author of the discovered. A pattern…
Listen, Zahi Hawass is a CONVICTED art and artifact thief. CONVICTED.. He is NOT going to reveal where any treasures are that he covets himself. He also is part of the Egyptian ministry of antiquities, he will not allow you to uncover anything he can't access himself. It doesn't matter if he is the visible last word, he will force the outcome in his favor EVERY time. You will learn nothing in Egypt until Zahi Hawass and all his cronies are dead.. Public execution would speed things up though..
Khufu / Cheops HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THAT PYRAMID! oh he saw it every day just like his father and his fathers father and his fathers father but HE had absolutely NOTHING to do with it.. Hell he wasn't even genetically related to the builders.
That 25" offset from the axis though, with base of 3×2 cubit in the niche.
Aside from the Djed pillar and foremost of the westerners actually apparently referring to stonehenge as 5:6 6:7 7:8 ratio column:capitol ratio…
The left and right eyes of the Djed are alway shown in the middel of the capitols and these represent the sun and the moon.
In the Aubrey holes of Stonehenge sat 56 columns at 5:6 ratio, with a 250" overall height, with diameters of 2 cubit footing (41.666"), 3 cubit base of column (62.5"), 2 cubit neck, 3 cubit top, to give the 1166.66" inner diameter of the sarsen circle at the Aubrey neck above the sarsen circle level top (1166.666 /6&7 rather than 1250" / 5&6 of the sarsen circle diameter used for the Trlithons and Aubrey columns).
This was used as the 500" apart avenue bank/ditch wavelength of 250" for a circle diameter of 80" (and peak to peak bank/ditch), cut into 24 arcs of 1/2 cubits.
At the node of this 250" Aubrey/Trilithon height sat a 18.75" diameter circle as 1/675th solar diameter of the Main Bank/ditch node at 4050" diameter with 450" wavelength and 144" diameter wheel of 24 arcs.
This 125" level up the Aubrey Column, would have a radius of exactly 25" with the solar disk tangent to the column.
To move the solar diameter to the Bank/Ditch node diameter from the Aubrey column diameter, requires a reduced solar disk diameter at the Aubrey column, at a lower level, pushing the 18.75" diameter disk further away, while using the same disk center to column center offset.
Now this would be 96" held aloft at the level of the bluestones + lintel, using the 7:8 ratio and a Pi lintel stone 150 sitting at the solstice line that sits upon a 5×5 common cubit square of the 360" circle using 25/8th Pi.
Now the eye line is at 14/15th of your height, with a bluestone lintel height of 5 geodetic greek cane cubits of 144/7", and the upright being 5 geodetic greek common cubits of 18";
That 14/15th x 144"/7 x 5 = 96" which when scaled 875/864 to convert Eratosthenes English to geodetic Greek makes that eye level 1/2 of the Sarsen circle height of 9.333 cubits.
This pushed the solar disk to the face of a 30 point polygon circumscribed by a 4050" circle, with the sundisk held aloft at 96" by the vitruvian 6x6ft human geometry.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwopKpJXRic
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGj_cZ_bN78
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ar50Tls4kBo