The Sovereignty Dispute Over the Falkland Islands

Legitimacy and Political Authority: The Sovereignty Dispute Over the Falkland Islands/ Islas Malvinas

INTRODUCTION
There have been more than one hundred territorial disputes since World War Two ( Huth, 2001 ) and by 2013, 51 of these remained unsolved ( Osterveld et al., 2015 ) thus showing the United Nations ’ limited exponent to resolve certain external conflicts. One of those disputes is that of the Falkland Islands ( Islas Malvinas in Spanish ). The archipelago is located about 300 miles from Argentina, about 1,200 miles from Buenos Aires and about 8,000 miles from London ( Lindsey, 1983 ). The Falklands are administered by Britain, with a substantial degree of self-government but claimed by Argentina. In 1982, after seventeen years of failed diplomatic negotiations, Argentina attempted to take the islands using military action and Britain responded by sending a tax impel, restoring british rule after two months of arm battle. Almost 1.000 people lost their lives during the war ( Viana, 2015 ). Far from resolving the controversy, the war made the expectation of an eventual liquidation evening more difficult. Why is the Falkland Islands dispute relevant in the early twenty-first hundred ? This is a concerning issue because the United Nations ( henceforth, the UN ) has not only been ineffective to resolve the conflict, it besides failed to prevent the war and became more of an obstacle towards finding a peaceful solution than a facilitator ( Gonzalez, 2013 ). This paper will demonstrate how complex this consequence is ; however, this sovereignty quarrel is undeniably less intricate, for example, than the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, presently involving five million palestinian refugees ( UNRWA, 2015 ). If after half a hundred of diplomatic negotiations the UN is still powerless to resolve the Falklands dispute ; would it be realistic to expect an effective and peaceful solution to other, more building complex disputes, such as the Israeli-Palestinian example ? The specific research trouble concerning this dissertation is the UN ’ s limited means to fulfil its obligations towards ‘ maintaining external peace and security ’ ( UN, 1945 : non-paginated ) stated in Article 1 of the Charter .
This inquiry has an interdisciplinary approach, including elements of political hypothesis and history, deoxyadenosine monophosphate well as international law. Heywood ( 2011:25 ) argues that “ politics and history are inextricably linked ”, but what is history ? Carr ( 1990:30 ) describes history as “ a continuous procedure of interaction between the historian and his facts, an ageless dialogue between the award and the past ”. Heywood ( 2011 ) notes that in the world of politics, not entirely history but besides hypothesis is crucial, because “ it gives human body and structure to an otherwise amorphous and confusing reality ” ( ibid : 53 ). The Falklands ’ controversy is examined here within the theoretical model of International Relations, giving particular attention to two of its key theories : reality and liberalism. From a realist position, history does not move ahead, it repeats itself, international relations are characterized more by conflict than cooperation and states have primacy in an external organization that is in a constant state of anarchy. Nation-States act only to promote their national sake, that is, self-preservation and must rely on self-help ( Griffiths, 2007 ; Halliday, 1994 ; Heywood, 2011 ). From a liberal position, international politics can be good understood by giving importance to nation-states adenine well as other key actors, in a world in which progress is potential and history is “ characterised by a growing expectation of international cooperation and peace ” ( Heywood, 2011:15 ). The UN is underpinned by free principles. however, even though it has brought a certain degree of international cooperation for more than seventy continuous years, yet there is a strong tension between its broad values and the “ bloody reality of populace politics ” ( Reisman, 1983:312 ). The Falkland Islands ’ controversy illustrates the extent to which Reisman is correct.

Four key political concepts will be discussed in order to provide a conceptual model for analysis. These concepts are : political authority, reign, self-determination, and colonialism ; It will be essential to identify and examine the complex interaction between these concepts adenine well as their evolution over time. Leach et al., ( 2011:3 ) define authority as “ the rightful habit of political power, or legitimate use of ability. baron may compel obedience, while assurance is widely accepted by those over whom it is exercised ”. Yet another key concept for this learn is sovereignty, meaning “ ultimate exponent, not subjugate to any higher assurance ” ( Calvert, 1982:1 ). During the 19th and first base half of the twentieth century, a number of european states practiced colonialism, defined by Loomba ( 2005:8 ) as “ the seduction and control of other people ’ second country and goods ” but in 1960, the UN started the process of decolonization, when a “ Third-World dominated General Assembly began to preach the end of colonialism and the paramountcy of self-government ” ( Gonzalez, 2013:20 ). self-government is defined by Toase ( 2005:148 ) as the peoples ’ “ correct to be allowed to determine freely their own political condition ”. Heywood ( 2011:114 ) notes that the UN operates in a model that follows the principle of external sovereignty, which “ guarantees that the territorial integrity and political independence of each department of state is impregnable ”, however a long as the principle of external sovereignty is given unquestionable domination, a serious concern exists that nation states could treat their citizens in any means that suits the state, highlighting the inevitable tension between external sovereignty and human rights ( Heywood, 2011 ) .
In give times, Argentina claims that Britain ’ s possession of the Falklands is an attack on its territorial integrity and demands that sovereignty over the archipelago is transferred, disregarding the wishes of the islands ’ population. Britain, argues that all peoples have the right to self-government and deoxyadenosine monophosphate hanker as the islanders wish to ‘ keep the Falklands british ’ this should remain thus. The Argentine claims are based on events which occurred over 180 years ago, when Britain allegedly usurped the islands. Britain ’ south claims are based on the present site, arguing the rights of the islanders should be respected according to 21st century democratic standards. The Falkland Islands controversy covers a broad period of time ; however, it would not be potential to offer an aim assessment of it without evaluating the assertions made by both claimants. Bearing in mind these remarks, the main determination of this undergraduate dissertation will be threefold : it will highlight the independent claims made by Argentina and Britain, consequently, it will evaluate the robustness of such claims and last, it will answer a keystone motion the UN has therefore far been ineffective to answer : who has the lawful political authority over the Falkland Islands ?
CHAPTER ONE
Calvert ( 1982 ) suggests the roots of conflicting sovereignty claims over the Falklands refer back to the in-between ages, when it was believed that all earthly office came from God, and the Pope had the power to arbitrate on territorial conflicts. In 1481, Pope Sixtus IV issued the Bull Æterni regis, which confirmed Castile ’ s sovereignty over the Canary Islands and gave Portugal possession of all far territorial acquisitions west of them ( Daniel and Ezpeleta, 2013 ). In 1493, Pope Alexander VI issued Inter caetera, which made Æterni regis disused by giving to Spain all overseas territorial possessions west and south of a finical credit line of line ( Muldoon, 1978 ). In 1494, Spain and Portugal, without any affair from the Pope and excluding all other european states, signed the Treaty of Tordesillas ( Hope, 1983 ), in which the line of line was shifted and “ all newly discovered lands to the east to be portuguese and to the west to be spanish ” ( Calvert, 1982:2-3 ). It is important to highlight the shift at the time, from absolute papal authority towards the alleged divine right of kings, marking the begin of a boring summons, which in 1648 lead to the Peace Treaty of Westphalia and “ recognition of the rights of each sovereign prince to determine the inner elements of his state ” ( Bethlehem, 2014:13 ) and so the external system was born, with the idea that intelligibly defined geographic units interact between them without any higher rule assurance, underpin, silent today, the congress of racial equality realist premise of state-centrism, which considers the nation-state as “ the key actor in the domestic region and on the world stage ” ( Heywood, 2011:4 ). It is essential to bear in beware the extent to which Papal Bulls and later external treaties sometimes became disused curtly after being signed, reflecting a peculiarly delicate balance of ability ; every clock time this libra changed new treaties were created to reflect the new proportion of power ( Escudé, 1986 ) .
Goebel ( 1982 : 2 ) notes that, “ upon more than one juncture when the entitle to the [ Falkland ] islands was under discussion, the properly to occupy and possess was grounded upon the allegation of discovery ”. Landaburu, ( 1989 ) mentions a number of explorers who may have discovered the islands : Vespucci ( 1502 ), working for Portugal, Magallanes ( 1520 ), working for Spain and the english sailors Davis ( 1592 ) and Hawkins ( 1594 ). For Goebel ( 1982 ) the first gear sailing master to voyage into the lower South Atlantic and likely finder was Vespucci. however, Groussac ( 1936 : 150 ) argues that even “ if Vespucci discovered the islands, he didn ’ t have such assurance, since he represented Portugal and the Malvinas are to the west of the [ 1494 ] line of line ”. Escudé, ( 1986 ), Hastings and Jenkins, ( 1983 ) and Reisman ( 1983 ) compass point out that it is unlikely it will ever be known who discovered the Islands, although, for Groussac ( 1936:165 ), “ from the point of watch of international law, the spanish sovereignty over the Malvinas started on the lapp day of discovery and possession of the River Plate ”. The importance of Groussac ( Ibid ) ’ south perception that spanish and later Argentine rights to the Falklands are authentic can not possibly be overstated : his book ‘ Les îles Malouines’, with highly selective historical data, became an necessity school text bible in 1930s Argentina. Carr ( 1990:11 ) argues that “ every diarist knows today that the most effective manner to influence impression is by the choice and agreement of the appropriate facts ”. This newspaper will show that Groussac ( 1936 ) was neither the first nor the stopping point person to follow that journalistic practice in relation to the Falklands .
We may never know who discovered the Falklands but what we do know is that their first base recorded name was given by Dutch bluejacket Sebald de Weert in 1600, who called them ‘ Sebald Islands ’ ( Escudé, 1986 ). In 1690, English boater Strong made the first undisputed land on the Falklands arsenic well as the first sail across the channel which divides the two chief islands ( Groussac, 1936 ; Strange, 1981 ), calling it ‘ Falkland Channel ’, from which their irregular mention derives. The third name was given by the first gear recorded settlers the Falklands ever had, a french colony established in 1764, which called them ‘ îles Malouines ’ ( Goebel, 1982 ). The current spanish name, ‘ Islas Malvinas ’, the one-fourth in chronological order, is a translation of the french identify ( Honeywell and Pearce, 1982 ). Escudé ( 1986 ) gives finical care to the chronological club in which the islands were named, adding that besides in chronological order Spain was the third state to settle on the Falklands. Calvert ( 1982:5 ) argues that “ the absence of a spanish name for the islands is the clearest possible proofread that they were neither discovered nor settled in the first example by Spain ”. however, Calvert ( ibid ) stops short in acknowledging the Falklands were not first discovered, named or settled by Britain either. Hastings and Jenkins, ( 1983:2 ) note that although the Treaty of Utrecht of 1713 gave Spain control over its overseas territories in the Americas, the eighteenth hundred was characterised by a impregnable trade competition between Spain, Britain and France .
In 1749 Britain requested permission from Spain for an excursion to the Falklands, permission was not granted and the british retreat this plan ( Lindsey, 1983 ). The first colonization, called ‘ Port Louis ’, on East Falkland, was that of Bougainville, who in 1764 took formal possession for France ( Goebel, 1982 ). Nine months former, Commodore Byron landed on Saunders Island, established ‘ Port Egmont ’ and formally declared british possession of “ this harbor and all the adjacent Islands ” ( cited in Goebel, 1982 : 232 ). According to Goebel ( ibid. ) Byron was unaware of the french settlement as he had left Europe before the public announcement of it. In 1766 the british and french found each early and “ the Falklands thus stumbled onto the stagecoach of world politics ” ( Hastings and Jenkins, 1983:3 ). The spanish were angry at what they regarded as a breach of the treaty of Utrecht by Britain and France. Spain complained to France and negotiations were soon on the way for a transfer of rights from France to Spain ( Lindsey, 1983 ), this job was completed in 1767 in restitution for indemnity from Spain and Port Louis was renamed ‘ Puerto de la Soledad ’ ( Calvert, 1982 ). Port Egmont remained under british dominance ( Etchebarne Bullrich, 2000 ) .
In 1770, a spanish naval force expelled the british garrison from Saunders Island ( Landaburu, 1989 ), this development closely led to an Anglo- spanish war, however, Spain chose to disown this action ( Calvert, 1982 ), a diplomatic settlement was reached, war was avoided and the british were allowed to return to Port Egmont. According to Goebel ( 1982 ) there was a ‘ hidden negotiation ’ by which Britain promised to leave the islands vitamin a soon as potential, however, no official document has always been found to attest this ( Escudé, 1986 ). One direction or another, Britain left Port Egmont in 1774 and did not return to the Falklands until 1833. Goebel ( 1982 ) notes the request for seamen to leave Port Egmont was related to an economy quantify and they were instructed to leave “ the proper marks or signs of possession and of its belong to the Crown of Great Britain ” ( Ibid : 409 ). The dedication left on May twentieth 1774 by the british read :

“ Be it known to all nations that the Falkland Islands, with this garrison, the storehouses, wharf, harbors, bays, and creeks thereunto belong to are the sole right and property of His Most Sacred Majesty George the Third, King of Great Britain, France and Ireland ” ( Cited in Goebel, 1982:140 )

In 1776 Spain created the Viceroyalty of the River Plate ( Landaburu, 1989 ), with Buenos Aires as its capital, and which jurisdiction included today ’ randomness Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay, Uruguay and the Falkland Islands ( Kohen, 2006 ). Goebel ( 1982 ) argues that between 1774 and 1811, Spain exercised reign over the Falklands without any british protest. The settlement was abandoned in 1811, when as a leave of the independence wars in Buenos Aires. In the same way british settlers had left a brass asserting rights to the Falklands, the spanish left their own adaptation of it :

“ This island, with its ports, buildings, dependencies and contents, belongs to the Sovereign King Fernando VII of Spain and his indies, Soledad of Malvinas, 7th February 1811 ” ( cited in Destefani, 1982:71 )

The 1810 May revolution marked the concluding legal separation between Buenos Aires and Spain and 6 years late emerged the United Provinces of the River Plate, declaring independence from Spain in 1816 ( Freedman, 2005 ). According to Landaburu ( 1989 ), the period marked the conversion in which the Falkland Islands, following the Uti Possidetis principle, were transferred from Spain to the Viceroyalty of the River Plate, and ultimately to the United Provinces of the River Plate. Uti Possidetis suggests that “ borders should be those that the respective countries had possessed at the meter of their independence from Spain ” ( Hensel et al., 2006:10 ). however, Metford ( 1982 ) and Hensel et aluminum. ( 2006 ) note that the Uti Possidetis rationale was initially an agreement between latin american states, it could lone be applied to conflicts between them, and it was not formally adopted until the Congress of Lima in 1847 -1848, about four decades after the alleged inheritance from Spain .
Calvert ( 1982:18 ) argues that “ the United Provinces were anything but united ” ; The raw nation had serious inner disagreements and soon after independence, even though Buenos Aires expected to continue being the capital of the whole territory once under the jurisdiction of the Viceroyalty, as many provinces refused to recognise Buenos Aires ’ agency, leading this to a serious crisis of authenticity in which huge areas which would finally form Bolivia, Paraguay and Uruguay decided to become independent from Buenos Aires ( Palermo, 2007 ). This shows that the theme that advanced day Argentina inherited from Spain the area once administered by the Viceroyalty of the River Plate, including the Falkland Islands, has to be taken with extreme point caution. The islands remained empty between 1811 and 1826, with the exception of a brief visit in 1820 by Captain Jewitt, an american english at the service of the United Provinces united states navy who claimed reign on their behalf, before returning to Buenos Aires ( Metfrod, 1982 ) .
In 1825, The United Provinces and Britain signed the “ Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation ”, in which Britain recognized the 1816 Independence Declaration, Landaburu ( 1989 ) and Taiana ( 2011 ) bill this treaty does not mention any territorial dispute between the two states. In 1829 Buenos Aires appointed Vernet as Governor of Malvinas ( Goebel, 1982 ), five months former The british Chargé d ’ affairs, Woodbine Parish, formally complained to the Minister of Foreign Affairs in Buenos Aires “ The Argentine Republic, in issuing this rule assumed authority incompatible with His Britannik Majesty ’ s rights of reign over the Falkland Islands ” ( Cited in Freedman, 2005 : 6 ). If there was a impression in Buenos Aires that the United Provinces had inherited the islands from Spain, what became clear was that in fact the Provinces actually inherited a territorial quarrel with Britain, still deliver to this day .
The 1820 United Provinces ’ claim over the islands had made no consequence on fishing activities from early nations. In 1831 Vernet seized three American vessels fishing in Falklands ’ waters and sailed to Buenos Aires in one of them to put it to trial ( Metford, 1982 ). The american english consul in Buenos Aires protested and Captain Duncan, sailed to the islands with USS Lexington, destroyed the military installations at Port Soledad and declared the islands free of all politics ( Freedman, 2005 ). In 1832 Buenos Aires sent Mestivier to the Falklands as a new acting commander but within a few weeks, Mestivier was killed by his own soldiers ( Strange, 1981 ). In January 1833, while Argentine Commander Pinedo was attempting to re-establish order, Captain Onslow arrived in East Falkland “ to take possession in the name of his Britannic Majesty ” ( Goebel, 1982:455 ). The Argentine garrison was expelled ( Groussac, 1936 ) but the little civilian population award on the islands was encouraged to remain there ( Fitte, 1974:373 ). Argentina formally protested to Britain but the official answer was that british rights to the Falklands were “ founded upon original discovery and subsequent occupation ” ( Palmerston, 1834, cited in Groussac, 1936:163 ) .
Goebel ( 1982:468 ) brings his inquiry to an end suggesting the validity of the Argentine claims are unquestionable but it is unfortunate his extraordinary study alone covers the time period up until 1833 because, for model, according to the Foreign Office, ( 1862 ) and Publicación Oficial ( 1863 ), in 1849 Britain and Argentina signed the “ Convention for re-establishing the perfect relations of friendship between Her Britannic Majesty and the Argentine Confederation ”, besides known as the “ Southern-Arana Treaty ”. This peace treaty brought to an end the british and french obstruct of the River Plate. It was ratified by Queen Victoria on 14th February 1850 ( Publicación Oficial, 1863:180 ) and by General Juan Manuel de Rosas on 10th May 1850 ( Publicación Oficial, 1863:176 ), with ratifications exchanged in Buenos Aires on 15th May 1850 ( Foreign Office, 1862:7 ). Clause VII describes the “ arrant friendship between Her Britannic Majesty ’ s Government and the Government of the Confederation ” ( Foreign Office, 1862:10 ; Publicación Oficial, 1863:175 ). The wording used in this convention suggests there were no pending issues between the two nations since it would be excessive to suggest two states can have a ‘ perfect kinship ’ while having a territorial dispute .
The matter seemed to be last settled in 1850, far evidence to support this call is the Latzina map ( Latzina, 1883 ) ( appendix B1 ), printed under the auspices of the Argentine President, Juárez Celman, and officially approved by the Argentine Congress ( United Nations, 2006 ). This map includes the southern point of South America, with Argentina printed in dark colours than its neighbor countries. ‘ Islas Malvinas ’ are shown outside Argentine jurisdiction, printed in the same color as Chile and Uruguay ( Latzina, 1883 ). other function followed, besides excluding the islands from the Argentine district, for example, one printed by La Prensa ( 1887 ) ( Appendix B3 ), although it has to be mentioned that a later translation of the Latzina map does show the Falklands as part of the Argentine territory ( Latzina, 1888 ) ( Appendix B4 ). In 1888 Paz Soldán ( 1888a ) ( Appendix B5 ) published a map of “ Gobernación of Tierra del Fuego e Islas Malvinas ”, with Falklands considered as separate of the Argentine territory ; In line with another Paz Soldán map ( 1888b ) ( Appendix B6 ) printed in the like year, which excludes the Falklands from the Argentine territory. There were further Argentine maps excluding the islands even into the first years of the twentieth hundred, for example, one printed by the Argentine War Ministry ( Ministerio de Guerra, 1905 ) ( Appendix B.7 ). The notice maps distinctly show that Argentina ’ mho position towards the Falklands at the end of the 19the hundred was far from consistent. There were a number of ephemeral Argentine protests to Britain in 1884, 1885, 1888 and 1908 ( Beck, 1988 ) but the economic relationship between the two states was thus important that the offspring was “ forget ” for the time being ( Etchebarne-Bullrich, 2000 : 156 ) .
chapter one has set the historical picture of the Falklands discussion. Goebel ( 1982 ) argues that in 1833 Argentina was exercising its legitimate sovereignty over the islands and he may be right, but history did not stop in 1833. By giving sol a lot attention to issues like the alleged ‘ secret agreement ’ between Spain and Britain and focusing on developments pre -1833, he chose to ignore historic facts which occurred merely a few years after the alleged british seduction of 1833 ; For exemplify, the 1850 ratification of the “ Convention for re-establishing the perfect relations of friendship between Her Britannic Majesty and the Argentine Confederation ” ( Foreign Office, 1862 ; Publicación Oficial, 1863 ). Had Goebel included the note Convention, his conclusion could have been favorable toward Britain. Did Argentina have any rights to the islands when it declared sovereignty over them in 1820 ? The Falklands had been under spanish rule and in Buenos Aires ’ jurisdiction for about half a century. According to Beck ( 1988 ) any british rights had lapsed since Britain had left the islands four decades earlier and Spain did not show any particular interest in returning to the Falklands after 1811. One way or another, it seems that Britain, being the most mighty empire at the clock, took by force the archipelago from a young and powerless nation, while Argentina was fighting its own civil wars. It must besides be highlighted that Britain never had a settlement on East Falkland until 1833. Was the british come back to the Falklands just a “ petit larceny conquest ” as described by Lindsey ( 1983:30 ) ? Reisman ( 1983:304 ) argues that “ stolen or not, the islands became british according to the prevailing international law ”, suggesting that storm was a legal way to acquire claim to a district in 1833. The future chapter will give Reisman ’ s instruction the importance it deserves .
CHAPTER TWO
In 1910, de Bernhardt produced a memo for the Foreign Office which had the deduction that in 1833 Britain seized master of a legitimate Argentine possession ( Lanús, 2011 ). In 1927, the british ambassador in Buenos Aires, after reading de Bernhardt ’ s memo contacted the Falklands ’ governor stating “ I had no estimate of the forte of the Argentine case, nor of the weakness of ours ” ( Robertson, 1927, cited in Beck, 1988:52 ). The memo remained unpublished and those doubts only existed in private. In the same class de Bernhardt ’ s memo was completed, Chueco ( 1910 ), published in Buenos Aires “ La República Argentina en su Primer Centenario ”, which included a map ( ibid : 39 ) ( appendix B.8 ), depicting the southern tip of South America, including Argentina, its neighbor countries and “ Islas Malvinas ó de Falkland ”. however, those islands are not named in chapter XV, which explores in contingent the entire Argentine territory. There is another map ( ibid : 54 ) ( appendix B.9 ), comparing the geographic area covered by Argentina against the size of some European countries which besides excludes the Falklands. Chueco ’ randomness publication seems to suggest that in 1910, the perception that the Malvinas were contribution of the Argentine territory was in doubt in important Argentine publications. The situation was about to change in Buenos Aires vitamin a well as London .
In the 1930s Argentina suffered what would late be called ‘ the infamous decade’, triggered by its first coup vitamin d ’ état, and to a greater extent, the area ’ sulfur political instability that brought to an abrupt end a period of economic prosperity. It is in that diachronic context that the reign dispute over the Falklands reawakens in Buenos Aires, with the government actively promoting “ the indoctrination of public opinion through the dispersion of maps and school textbooks with denotative references to the nation ’ second rights over the Malvinas ” ( Gonzalez, 2013:25 ). At the same time but on the other side of the Atlantic, the british government, after accepting that events prior to 1833 were not angstrom supportive to the british claims as beginning opinion, reached the conclusion that “ one hundred years ’ possession, whether disputed or not, should find a perfectly sound entitle to sovereignty in external police ” ( Beck, 1988:53 ).
The twentieth century, described by Hobsbawm ( 2002, non-paginated ) as “ the most homicidal in record history ” had a significant impingement on the Falklands controversy deoxyadenosine monophosphate well as on the broader arena of world politics.1914 witnessed the begin of World War One, arguably brought to an conclusion in 1919 with the Treaty of Versailles and the creation of the League of Nations. Heywood ( 2011:32 ) notes that “ World War I was meant to be the ‘ war to end all wars ’ and so far, within a coevals a moment World War broke out ”, the League of Nations proved to be ineffective towards its aim of promoting universe peace. Carr ( 1970 ) dedicated “ The 20 years’ crisis, 1919-1939 ” to “ the makers of the coming peace ” ( Carr, 1970 : four ), not because he believed, like the liberals, that “ opportunism could be replaced by the shared objective of security for all ” ( Burchill and Linklater, 2009:1 ), rather, Carr ( 1970 ), equally well as Morgenthau ( 1993 ), concluded that the lone direction to properly reform and improve external relations is by taking into account the clamber for world power built-in in the international system, which is precisely what the league of Nations had failed to do ( Burchill and Linklater, 2009 ). The League of Nations ’ failed to avert World War Two but the end of the war brought the universe of the UN, besides based upon broad principles and with the lapp objective of promoting external peace. however, the UN is importantly different from The League of Nations ’ in one cardinal respect ; it appears to acknowledge the struggle for power implicit in in the international system by adopting its Charter and subsequent resolutions designed in an “ frequently obscure and equivocal ” way frankincense taking into report opposing national interests which “ find a common footing on which all those different national interests can meet in harmony ” ( Morgenthau, 1993:259 ) .
In 1960 the UN General Assembly adopted Resolution 1514 entitled “ Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples ” ( UN, 1960a : non-paginated ). In 1961, the UN created the extra Committee on Decolonisation with the determination of monitoring the execution of solution 1514 ( UN, 1964 ). Most Falkland Islands ’ key debates between Argentina and Britain during the twentieth hundred occurred within the framework of the UN process of decolonization. however, is the process of decolonization truly associate to the Falklands ? The independent determination of such summons is to grant independence to subjugated peoples but in this shell, none of the political actors involved has ever shown any interest in transforming the islands into an freelancer state, furthermore, the islands ’ population are by all accounts not subjugated by a settler power and from the Argentine vantage point, they are not ‘ a people ’ either, but “ British citizens who live in the Islas Malvinas ” ( Timerman, 2013, in McElroy, 2013 ). The UN has early important bodies which could address this sovereignty topic more appropriately, for exemplar, the International Court of Justice, described by Heywood ( 2011 : 342 ) as “ the most far-reaching attack to date to apply the rule of law to international disputes ”. It has to be mentioned that the Falkland Islands dispute has never been brought for arbitration to the International Court of Justice ( Beck, 1988 ) .
In 1965, the General Assembly adopted Resolution 2065 inviting Argentina and Britain to enter negotiations in order to resolve this sovereignty dispute. resolution 2065 was a mastermind leave of Argentine ambassador Ruda ’ s lecture to the Decolonization Committee, described by Argüello, ( 2011 : 70 ) as “ the cornerstone of the obliged source of reference about the Question Malvinas ”. It is inauspicious that Gonzalez ’ second ( 2013 ) detailed research of the Argentine- british negotiations of the 1960s, in more than 200 pages chose to focus on the results of Ruda ’ s language without assessing the accuracy of its assertions. A critical analysis of the 1964 speech shows it contains a significant number of historical inaccuracies, which raises serious questions about the substantial, as opposed to fanciful forte of the Argentine claims.
Ruda ( 2015 ) argued that the Falklands were undoubtedly discovered by spanish navigators thanks to whom spanish maps started including the islands between 1526 and 1529. In contrast, Escudé, ( 1986 ), Hastings and Jenkins, ( 1983 ) and Reisman ( 1983 ) point out it is improbable it will ever be known for sure who discovered the Falklands. furthermore, Escudé, ( 1986 ) and Groussac, ( 1936 ) note it was only after a dutch explorer ’ randomness voyage to the South Atlantic, in 1600, that these islands were added to maps. Ruda ( 2015 ) besides stated that the british left a brass in Port Egmont claiming the Falkland ’ mho island, in singular, belonged to King George III, and, in any case, alone a brass could not possibly give any right to sovereignty since it was against the external police of the time. First of all, Ruda distinctly confused the 1774 British plaque which stated “ the Falkland Islands are” ( in Goebel, 1982 : 140 ), in unequivocal plural, with the spanish brass left on East Falkland in 1811 which did refer to “ this island ”, in singular ( Destefani, 1982:71 ). The fact that Britain and Spain left signs informing of their intentions not to abandon the territory suggests that it was according to common practice of the clock time. Ruda besides argued that about all Argentine settlers were expelled from the islands in 1833 but according to Fitte ’ s research ( 1974 ), merely 4 civilians chose to leave, and by 1851, about 70 people from the pre-1833 civilian settlement were calm living on the islands ( Etchebarne Bullrich, 2000 ). even today, the English talk islands ’ population uses spanish words inherited from the pre-1833 colony ( Niebieskikwiat, 2014 ). last, Ruda ( 2015 ) suggested that when Britain and the United Provinces signed the 1825 Treaty of Friendship, Britain, by not mentioning explicitly there was a pending territorial quarrel, implicitly recognised Argentina ’ s reign over the islands. If this was valid criticism, in any case, Ruda handily forgot to mention the Southern-Arana treaty, signed in 1849 and ratified in 1850, after about two decades of effective british administration of the Falklands, which describes the “ arrant relationship ” between Argentina and Britain and made no address about any pending territorial disputes either .
Should the Argentine and British claims be judged by 19th hundred or by give standards ? Judge Huber, in the external arbitration of the Island of Palmas lawsuit, stated that “ a judicial fact must be appreciated in the light of the police contemporary with it ” ( Huber, 1925, cited in Elias, 1980:286 ). Sharma ( 1997 ) argues that the practice of force was a perfectly legal way to acquire claim to a territory until 1945. furthermore, according to Elias ( 1980:292 ) “ the state that is in effective occupation at the time of the challenge should be deemed to possess a ranking championship, since modern international police does not accept an abstraction title unsupported by effective occupation ”. If the interpretations of external law included above are accurate, tied if any former british rights had lapsed, Britain acquired the sovereign right to the Falklands in 1833 following the law at the time, possibly not in an admirable manner but still legally ( Reisman, 1983 ). Ruda ’ sulfur 1964 manner of speaking raises at least two major questions : why did he make such a number of inaccurate assertions if the Argentine rights to the Falklands are adenine potent as he wanted the UN to believe ? This surely undermines any credibility towards the Argentine claims. There is another authoritative question ; were the british representatives at the UN unaware of Ruda ’ randomness inaccurate claims ? Or were those representatives unwilling to challenge them ?
In answer to the first doubt, it appears that Ruda was attempting to achieve a resolution favorable to Argentina, even if this mean intentionally misleading the Decolonisation Committee. Why did Britain not challenge this ? The british representatives did not want to attract any unnecessary attention, because, unlike Argentina, Britain had other pending colonial issues at the UN, one of them was, Diego Garcia, one of the islands that form the Chagos archipelago, in the indian Ocean. In 1965, british ministers offered the man who would become the first mauritanian Prime Minister, Seewoosagur Ramgoolam, independence from Britain in central for three million Pounds and accept the insulation of Chagos from Mauritius, or no independence at all. Ramgoolam accepted independence in those terms ( Vine, 2009 ). Between the 1960s and 1970s, more than 2.000 native islanders were expelled from Diego Garcia, without any reference and denying them the right to self-determination ( Gonzalez, 2013 ; Honeywell and Pearce, 1982 ; Pilger, 1998 ; Vine, 2009 ). once Diego Garcia was uninhabited, without any involvement from the UK Parliament or American Congress, Britain leased the island to the United States, in order to build a US military base ( Pilger, 2004 ). The fact that british colonialist ambivalence honours self-determination to the Falkland Islanders but denied this to the native population of Diego Garcia does not mean the external community should ask or allow Britain to repeat a wrong and deny this correct to Falklanders deoxyadenosine monophosphate well .
In 1965 the UN General Assembly adopted resolutions 2065 and 2066, on the questions of The Falkland Islands ( Malvinas ) and Mauritius respectively. resolution 2065 invited the governments of Argentina and Britain to proceed “ with the negotiations recommended by the Special Committee on the Situation with respect to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples ” ( UN, 1965 ) ( Appendix A3 ). In contrast, resolution 2066 explicitly mentions the “ unforfeitable right of the people of the Territory of Mauritius to freedom and independence ” and invites the administering power, Britain, “ to take no legal action which would dismember the Territory of Mauritius and violate its territorial integrity ” ( UN, 1965 : non-paginated ). It must be highlighted that resolution 2065 is peculiarly unhelpful, since it does not suggest either that the Falklands ’ population have the correct to self-government or that the islands are perceived as separate of the Argentine national territory. There were 17 years of failed diplomatic negotiations between Argentina and Britain after the borrowing of Resolution 2065 .
In Mein Kampf, Hitler ( 1926:708, cited in Carr, 1970:210 ), argued that “ the winning back of lose territories is not achieved through grave invocations of the Lord God or through pious hopes in a League of Nations, but through armed impel ”. Hitler ’ s instruction relates to the realist impression that states can lone rely on self-help, and places a strong stress on the theme that the most effective creature for a submit to protect its district is not through statesmanship but by actual armed force. As if inspired by Hitler ’ sulfur words, on 2nd April 1982, the military military junta governing Argentina decided to take by force the district their area had been unable to ‘ recover ’ by diplomatic means and invaded the Falklands. The civilian population on the islands was assured it would be protected and respected in every possible way but at the same time the Argentine military imposed an regulate for all vehicles to be driven on the right-hand side of the road ( Middlebrook, 1989 ), mail from the islands became postmark ‘ Islas Malvinas, República Argentina ” ( Beck, 1988:5 ) and Port Stanley was re-named “ Puerto Argentino ” by national decree ( Infojus, 1983 ). Toase ( 2005 ) notes that Argentina violated the UN Charter, which prohibits the use of military unit in international relations ; however, Argentina ’ s alien Minister at the clock, Costa Mendez, suggested that the “ Charter ’ s address to the non-use of storm entirely applied to disputes which began after 1945, when the Charter came into effect ” ( Costa Mendez, 1982, cited in Toase, 2005:155 ). swiftly after the Argentine invasion, the UN adopted resoluteness 502 ( Appendix A4 ) demanding “ an immediate withdrawal of all Argentine forces from the Falkland Islands ” ( UN, 1982 : non-paginated ), Argentina ignored this resolution and Britain responded by sending a job force. On 26th May, the UN adopted Resolution 505 ( Appendix A5 ) demanding a cessation of hostilities, however, this solution was besides ignored, this time by both sides. The realists secretly rejoiced : this was pure naturalism in action ; two UN members went to war with each other, openly disregarding resolutions adopted by the General Assembly. The war continued until Argentina surrendered after an armed conflict in which about 1.000 people lost their lives ( Viana, 2015 ). The UN became a powerless bystander, failing its primary obligation towards maintaining international peace and security .
It is essential to highlight that regardless of which state had the strongest claims, the Falklands remained administered by the strongest military power, frankincense showing there is a stark remainder between people having the right to self-determination and being able to exercise it ; without the british Armed Forces, it is unthinkable the Falklands ’ population would have been able to recover their freedom. possibly the best exemplar to illustrate this is the lawsuit of Diego Garcia ; Pilger, ( 2004, non-paginated ) highlights the direction in which in 1982 Britain sent a evanesce to “ save two thousand Falkland Islanders at the other end of the universe, while two thousand british citizens in islands in the middle of the indian Ocean had been expelled by british governments. The alone deviation was that one fortune were white and the others were black ”. In 1982 the british Government paid four million Pounds to the Mauritius Government as a final examination village of all claims on the condition that the Ilois people would not be returning to Diego Garcia ( Colling, 1999 ). In the lapp year, Britain had spent an estimated seven hundred million Pounds during the Falklands war, in order to defend the Falkland Islanders right to determine their own manner of life and political future ( Thatcher, 1982, in New York Times, 1982 ) .
It is beyond the telescope of this paper to explore the reasons for the 1982 war, or its broader political consequences, although it must be said the Falklands War changed radically the fortunes of british Prime Minister Thatcher a well as Argentina ’ s military dictatorship ( Gonzalez, 2013 ). President Galtieri was forced to resign three days after Argentina surrendered ( Calvert, 1982 ) and the country held democratic elections the follow year, marking the end of the military govern. In Britain, ironically, the button-down defense cuts which to some extent encouraged the Argentine military to believe Britain would not respond to an invasion, led to a war which “ as a result of victory, greatly increased the politics ’ second popularity ” ( Garnett and Lynch, 2012 : 451 ). Margaret Thatcher, who was well behind in the polls before the war, even won the 1983 General Election by landslide ( Jenkins, 2013 ) .
It is in this chapter that the theories of realism and liberalism intelligibly start to face each other. Was the twentieth century characterised more by conflict than cooperation ? The two world wars, let alone many other important international conflicts, seem to suggest therefore. Nevertheless, the creation of organisations like the League of Nations and the UN digest the theme that liberalism is well prepare to challenge the realists ’ belief. This chapter highlights the extent to which international law is different from domestic law ; national courts can impose a verdict on a person found guilty of an discourtesy, in international police, in contrast, a state can merely disregard the legal power of the international court of department of justice ( Morgenthau, 1993 ). Argentina and Britain chose, arguably without any more attractive option, to bring the Falklands ’ consequence to the Decolonisation Committee, which so army for the liberation of rwanda has been inadequate to solve this challenge ; Both countries seem to be at odds with the UN ; the early is attempting to impose foreigner rule over the Falklands population, the latter, wants to give the islanders the correct to self-determination which no UN resoluteness has explicitly given to them up to this date. This chapter shows that from the point of view of the UN, the answer to our research question is slightly inconclusive. There is a third perspective which may help us to reach a clear result to our main question : what are the roots of legitimate political agency in the early twenty-first hundred ? The future and final chapter will explore that fundamental doubt .
CHAPTER THREE
The final ten of the twentieth hundred, during Menem ’ second presidencies ( 1989-1999 ), can be described as the highest period in the Argentine- UK relations since the 1982 war ( Dodds, 2007 ). The 1990s were characterised by the alleged Argentine ‘ charm nauseating ’ ; without affecting either party ’ second sovereignty claims over Falklands, Argentina and Britain were able to re-establish a reasonably full relationship, setting aside differences and focusing on their common interests. Thanks to this enterprise, called the ‘ reign umbrella ’ Britain and Argentina started to cooperate on fisheries conservation and oil and accelerator exploration and an air connect was created between Falklands and Chile overflying Argentine airspace ( Dodds, 2012 ; Gil, 1999 ). At the like time, in 1994 Argentina made a constitutional amendment which included a mandate to ‘ recover ’ the fully exercise of reign over the islands, respecting islanders ’ way of animation and their interests but not their wishes ( appendix A.6 ) ( Gil, 2012 ) .
In 2001, Argentina suffered one of its worst economic and political crises ( Cohen, 2012 ). The country changed five presidents in ten days ( Clarín, 2003 ), the national currency lost 70 % of its prize and there were dramatic levels of inflation and unemployment ( Hendrix, 2015 ). The twenty-first hundred started in Argentina by repeating a site highlighted doubly in chapter two ; echoing Morgenthau ’ south ( 1993:7 ) suggestion that “ man responds to social situations with insistent patterns ”, the 2001 Argentine crisis was followed, equitable like in the 1930s and 1980s, by an intensification in Argentine coerce towards the Falklands. Successive Kirchner governments implemented an economic barricade aimed at strangling the islands ’ economy. Between other measures, Argentina withdrew permission for charter flights to Falklands to overfly Argentine airspace, cancelled the 1995 oil exploration agreement around the islands and, shipping companies were not allowed to cross Argentine territorial waters when travelling to and from the Falklands ( Doods, 2012 ; Miller, 2012 ; Niebieskikwiat, 2007 ). There were some dissenting argentine voices against the government ’ sulfur scheme to ‘ recover ’ the Islands ; a group of intellectuals and journalists published an unfold letter demanding that the islanders are included in all Falklands related discussions and the abdication of “ all purpose of imposing on them a sovereignty, a citizenship and a politics they do not wish ” ( La Nación, 2012, non-paginated ). There were besides concerns about the practicalities of any electric potential reign transfer as Lanata ( 2012 ) highlighted the miss of retainer towards the destiny of the 3.000 people living on the islands in the unlikely consequence of a sovereignty transfer. How can Argentina possibly follow its constitutional mandate on respecting the interests of the islanders without having a meaningful dialogue with them ? In 2009 an amended Falkland Islands Constitution came into force, enhancing the powers of the islands ’ Executive Council and explicitly including the islanders ’ right to self-determination ( Falkland Islands Government, 2009 ). Aramburu ( 2012 ) argues that it is not a constitution as such in the advanced understanding of it, since alternatively of being adopted by the people it has been dictated by a british Monarch. This paper will return to such argument in due course .
In 2011, Argentine defense minister, Puricelli, ( 2011, in Mercopress, 2011, non-paginated ) described Britain as keeping “ 2,000 islanders hostages of its cussed strategic motives ”, the pursue year an all-party coalition joined Argentine President Cristina de Kirchner on a formal visit to reaffirm their sovereignty claims over the Falklands ’ at the UN, showing a political integrity beyond party politics. In March 2013, a referendum was held in the Falklands and the vote population was given the choice to change or maintain the political condition of the islands. The referendum resultant role was an overwhelm 99.8 % for maintaining the status quo ( Marroquín, 2014:413 ). Kohen ( 2014, in Maastricht University, 2014, non-paginated ) argues no one should give excessively much attention to a plebiscite in which “ british citizens were asked if they wanted to remain british ”. however, the referendum interview was not about the nationality of the electorate but about the political condition of the islands ; the specific interview asked in the referendum was : “ Do you wish the Falkland Islands to retain their current political status as an Overseas Territory of the United Kingdom? YES or NO ” ( United Nations, 2014:1 ). The referendum proceedings were supervised by an mugwump group of observers from Brazil, Chile, Mexico, New Zealand, Uruguay and the USA, which reached the decision that the “ referendum process was loose and bazaar, reflecting the democratic will of eligible Falkland Island voters ” ( The Referendum International Observation Mission, 2013 ). Argentine President Cristina de Kirchner described the islanders not as hostages any long, but as “ a bunch together of squatters voting on whether or not to keep occupying a build up illegally ” ( Kirchner, 2013, in Clarín, 2013, non- paginated ) .
Let us immediately summarise the current Argentine and British reign claims so these can be evaluated. Argentina argues the islands are geographically part of its home district, insisting that regardless of who lives on them, these were discovered by Spain, inherited by Argentina, illegally occupied by Britain in 1833 and Argentina has been complaining always since ( Kohen, 2014, in Maastricht University, 2014 ). The claim that Falklands are geographically part of Argentina has been described by Chehabi ( 1985:221 ) as the most attractive argumentation “ to the layman ” ; since the Falklands are closer to Argentina than to Britain, it is natural to assume they belong to the former. however, “ territorial proximity alone is meaningless in international police ” ( Chehabi, 1985:221 ), differently, Ceuta and Melilla, in Northern Africa, ironically overlooking the british Overseas Territory of Gibraltar, would not be spanish cities, Alaska would not be share of the United States and Greenland would not belong to Denmark. Regarding discovery and further inheritance from Spain, Argentina does not acknowledge, let alone challenge, the controversy that it is improbable it will ever be known who actually discovered the islands ( Escudé, 1986 ; Hastings and Jenkins, 1983 ; Reisman, 1983 ). furthermore, Escudé ( 1986 ), Lindsey ( 1983 ), Nixon ( 2013 ), Reisman ( 1983 ) and Sharma ( 1997 ) argue that acquiring territory by conquest was actually legal until 1945. furthermore, the hypnotism that Argentina has been complaining since 1833 is simply untruthful : the 1849-1850 Peace Treaty, which uniquely describes the ‘ perfect friendship ’ between Britain and Argentina ( Publicación Oficial, 1863 : 175 ) suggests the matter was settled in the nineteenth century. The british argument is well elementary : Britain claims the islands ’ population has the right to self-determination and since the 2013 referendum shows that the islanders want the Falklands to remain british, this should be so until the population decides otherwise. The troublesomeness for this position is that self-determination, in drill, means national self-government ( Pittman, 2009 ). In the context of the UN decolonization process, self-determination is about state formation and not about choosing to remain a non-self-governing district ( Toase, 2005 ). Was it not the case that “ all peoples have the right to self-government ” ? ( UN, 1960a : non-paginated ). hera, an important luff must be highlighted, which although does not make the Argentine case any stronger, presents a problem for the islanders : the Falkland Islands are not a nation, nor share of one, the islanders have no formal parliamentary representation in the UK and pay no taxes to the british treasury ( Aramburu, 2012 ). Individual rights may undermine the sovereignty of the state state, however, in the case of self-government ; realism clearly holds the upper hand, supporting the state-centrist approach. The UN is underpinned by big principles ; however, it honours some rights for individuals that live in a nation state but restricts the same rights to those who do not : self-government is one of those rights. The UN appears to be ill-prepared to deal with people living in a non-self-governing territory which is unwilling or unable to declare independence. here is the enormous difference between, for case, the possibility of Scotland declaring independence from Britain, and the people of the Falklands attempting to exercise self-determination by retaining their relationship with Britain as a non-self-governing territory.
Put concisely, Argentina claims Britain has been violating its territorial integrity since 1833. Britain argues the controversy over the Falklands should be assessed in the light of current principles, like the right to self-determination. Should the Argentine and British claims be evaluated according to 19th or by twenty-first hundred standards ? chapter two concisely mentioned the doctrine of Intertemporal Law, used by Judge Huber ’ s ruling in the international arbitration of the Island of Palmas subject, where he concluded that “ a judicial fact must be appreciated in the light of the law contemporaneous with it ” ( Cited in Elias, 1980:286 ). however, Huber noted that there is a difference between acquiring a autonomous claim and keeping it suggesting suggests that even if a autonomous style was acquired according to the international law at the fourth dimension, the alone way to continue holding that title is if the state administering the district is able to adjust to the evolution of international law ( Huber, 1925, in Elias, 1980 ). This presents a problem for both claimants : Britain is ignoring the fact that, for the UN, it is not an option for Falklands to remain a non-self-governing territory ( Willetts, 2013 ). On the other hired hand, with or without historic rights over the islands, Argentina is intending to impose stranger rule over a community that, in some cases, can trace up to nine generations living in the Falklands ( Niebieskikwiat, 2014 ). Argentina insists that “ Malvinas is not an issue of self-government, it is about sovereignty and who these islands belong to ” ( Timerman, 2013, cited in MinutoUno, 2013 ). Timerman, among many others, refers to the Falklands as if there was no population on them but Calvert ( 1982:145 ), in contrast, describes the islands as “ a place where people live ” .
According to Article 1 of the 1948 declaration of Human Rights “ all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights ” ( UN, 1948, non-paginated ). With this article in mind, Buchanan ( 2003 ) asks a fundamental question : why is it that “ if we are all basically peer, some should have the baron to make, apply, and enforce laws on the lie of us ? ” ( ibid : 155 ). After a careful analysis, Buchanan ( 2003 ) reaches the decision that “ any agent who attempts to impose rules on us without enjoying democratic mandate would not satisfy the prerequisite of reconciling the inequality that the exercise of political power invokes with the fundamental equality of persons ” ( ibid:158 ). In early words, according to Buchanan ( 2003 ) the roots of legitimate political agency in the twenty-first century are in what is called ‘ popular sovereignty ’, the estimate that “ people are the ultimate reservoir of all legitimate agency ” ( Duncan et aluminum, 2009:273 ) .
The current situation regarding the Falklands is not ideal for either of the two claimant states. however, from the position of Human Rights, there is sufficient evidence to suggest the british argument, although not flawless, weighs more than the Argentine. The Argentine grievances related to 1833 are veridical, but from a historic point of see, the Argentine arguments for reign over the islands are based on aspirant think and manipulated accounts of history, to the extent that Escudé ( 1986:217 ) calls the islands as contribution of Argentina ’ s “ fanciful district ”. Heywood ( 2011:113 ) argues that “ the sole legitimate source of political assurance is success in regular, fair and competitive elections ”, no political authority can be legitimate without democratic mandate. This suggestion is not completely elementary for Britain and the islanders : although it is beyond this composition ’ mho telescope to explore the relationship between the Falklands ’ democratically elected Legislative Assembly and their governor, appointed by the british monarch, it is authoritative to return to Aramburu ( 2012 ) ’ s argumentation that not entirely the Governor, but besides the constitution is ‘ imposed ’ on the islanders. In response to this, the Falklands ’ referendum may lone have a emblematic meaning, however, it challenges head-on the claims that the islanders have a politics imposed on them, since 99.8 % of the islands ’ voting population intelligibly accepts the constituent arrangement in which “ The executive authority of the Falkland Islands is vested in Her Majesty ” ( Falkland Islands Government, 2009 : 31 ) .
possibly Argentina ’ s major trouble regarding the Falklands is the fact that if or when the islanders decide thus, they can resort to UN resolution 1541 ( UN, 1960b ) ( Appendix A.2 ), which provides three net alternatives for the islands to become a self-governing-territory but there is no legitimate path of action for Argentina, a long as it tries to subjugate the population of the islands and impose on them a government they do not want. There is in this newspaper an implicit defense of the right of peoples to shape their own political lives, however, in malice of the fact that from a Human Rights ’ perspective, the british argument for sovereignty over the Falklands is stronger than the Argentine, yet, it is not flawless. If we isolate this controversy from the broad context of international politics, and consider the contradictions of the Argentine claims over the islands, it is attractive to conclude the british rights over the Falklands are axiomatic. however, international disputes do not happen in a vacuum, and digest in mind the way Britain deal with early colonies, the incompatibility of the british argument comes to light, a well as the dichotomy between convinced and prescriptive analysis of international relations. Heywood ( 2011 ) asks three fundamental questions : To what extent has the 1948 Universal declaration of Human rights rightfully challenged the 1648 Westphalian system ? Are human rights unquestionably universal in practice, or lone in theory ? Do homo rights apply evenly to all peoples and societies ? In the particular case of Diego Garcia, for exemplify, the way in which british citizens were expelled by a british government from their native land, was condemned and described as unlawful by the british High Court in 2000 ( Vidal and Bowcott, 2012 ). Buchanan ( 2003 ) ’ mho research for the roots of legitimate political authority undeniably grants the Falklands ’ sovereignty to Britain. however, as noted in chapter two, the reality is that the Falkland islanders were able to counteract the 1982 invasion and the 2000s economic barricade not because of their rights, but thanks for british military and economic support respectively. It is worth mentioning that at the time of writing, Argentina seems to be going through a significant political transition, characterised less with dispute than with cooperation, in domestic and international matters. The Kirchner era appears to be over, but it remains to be seen what affect recently elected President Macri, will have in relation to the Falklands dispute. about 20 years ago, Macri expressed his opinion that a sovereignty transfer of the islands would mean an extra deficit to the Argentine economy, in a nation then large, which should not have any territorial disputes ( Macri, 1997, cited in Perfil, 2015 ). As president, Macri is more timid in expressing his point of view about the Falklands, but there is a more reconciliatory tone in the modern Argentine government regarding this battle. In the Kirchner days, the dominant allele sermon was about “ the absolute diachronic validity and legality of the [ Argentine ] claim ” ( Atanasof, 2011 : 20 ) ; in 2016, Macri argues “ we don ’ deoxythymidine monophosphate disown what we believe ours, but we are bequeath to dialogue ” ( Macri, 2016, in Minuto Uno, 2016 ). Is Macri starting to suggest that there may be a conflict between the Argentine belief towards Falklands and a potentially different world ?
With or without diachronic rights over the territory, equally farseeing as Argentina does not consider the wishes of the islands ’ population, its sovereignty claims over the islands in question are inadequate for contemporary democratic standards. however, if the Falkland islanders are able to shape their political future, it is not because of their mighty to do so, alternatively, it is british political, military and economic power which preserves the islands ’ way of life against undue external influence. There is no international legislative body to enforce the deference for human rights ; this fact further supports the realist impression in the anarchic nature of international relations. As note, realists believe that states have primacy in the international system, hence the national concern, sometimes in conflict with individuals ’ rights, must come beginning, frankincense for realists, human rights are a ‘ voiced ’ return, as opposed to ‘ hard ’ concerns “ such as the avocation of security and prosperity ” ( Heywood, 2011:310 ). possibly the most interesting irony in the Falkland Islands dispute is having a former colonial empire, Britain, defending the broad correct to self-determination of people in one of its late colonies, on the other pass, there is a early spanish colony, Argentina, arguing the sixteenth hundred colonial borders should be respected, careless of the wishes of the population that lived in the Falklands for closely two centuries .
CONCLUSION
This paper illustrates the complexities entailed in assessing rights and wrongs in a sovereignty dispute which developed over such a long period of time. The british claim that the islanders have the correct to choose their political future coincides with twenty-first hundred democratic values, by which no political authority can be legitimate without democratic authority ( Heywood, 2011 ). This newspaper besides shows Argentina is attempting to apply twenty-first hundred principles, like the illegality of seduction, to an act that occurred two centuries earlier, while its claims over the islands are based on misinform and manipulated accounts of history. furthermore, angstrom long as Argentina attempts to interfere with the islands ’ room of life without the islanders ’ accept this does not “ satisfy the prerequisite of reconciling the inequality that the exercise of political might invokes with the fundamental equality of persons ” ( Buchanan, 2003:158 ). From a rigorously legal point of position, the analysis provided suggests that Britain has a stronger claim, since, first base of all, the consumption of military unit was a legitimate way to acquire deed to a district in the nineteenth hundred ( Escudé, 1986 ; Lindsey, 1983 ; Nixon, 2013 ; Reisman, 1983 ; and Sharma, 1997 ) and a submit which is in effective possession of a territory has a superior title, let alone when the possession existed for about two centuries ( Elias, 1980 ). Having said that, the merely way to reach a definitive answer to this reign quarrel from the vantage point of external law, would be if or when both claimant states decide to take the matter for arbitration to the International Court of Justice since the participation of the Decolonisation Committee has been inadequate to resolve this conflict which does not involve a repress people. This leads us to a net airfield for further research : to what extent do Argentina and Britain in truth want to find a concluding colonization for this quarrel ? Do any of these states want to resolve the conflict at all ? This study highlights a number of reoccurring historic patterns ; one of those reoccurrences is the fact that from the attack, this dispute has been managed, as opposed to resolved, first between Britain and Spain and late between Argentina and Britain. Briscoe ( 2014, in Maastricht University, 2014 ; non-paginated ), describes the Falklands ’ controversy as “ a quarrel in both sides ’ interests ”. What is the impact on this dispute of other, obviously unrelated political interests ? Does Britain have a Royal Navy so it can defend the Falklands or does Britain have the Falklands so it has an excuse to fund its Royal Navy ? ( Briscoe, 2014, in Maastricht University, 2014 ). Does Argentina truly want to resolve a quarrel which, vitamin a long as it remains abeyant, can be re-awakened as politics of diversion every fourth dimension there is a serious crisis, such as in the 1930s, 1980s or early 2000s ? There is even another major question this abruptly dissertation could not address : what function does oil in the South Atlantic play in this dispute ? unfortunately, answering these authoritative questions falls outside this paper ’ second oscilloscope. however, these questions do not represent a barrier towards finding a clear suffice to the main wonder concerning this newspaper ; in compendious, who has the legalize authority over the Falkland Islands ? This dissertation demonstrates the legitimate political authority over the territory rests with Britain, equally long as it has the accept of the islanders. however, this is not to idealise Britain as the champion of homo rights ; Escudé ( 1984:91 ) suggests that “ for Argentines the district is sacred, for the british it is the individual rights that are sacred ”. This analyze shows Escudé ’ south suggestion is exaggerated ; the inconvenient truth for Britain is that, although it is defending a community of some 3.000 people from a hostile neighbor and supporting their proper to choose their way of life without undue external hindrance, in similar but not identical circumstances, Britain expelled the entire population of Diego Garcia from their native land during the 1960s and 1970s. however , this is not to say the Falklands ’ population should be punished for the british colonialist past. The uncomfortable truth for Argentina, is that a careful analysis of 19th hundred historical facts, does not support its historical claims, furthermore, setting aside the significant measure of inconsistencies in the Argentine assertions, what the country is trying to do is annex, in the twenty-first hundred, a territory with no cultural links with Argentina and against the wishes of its non-Argentine permanent population . even if the islanders have the correct to self-government, this does not mean they can automatically exercise that right ; the 1982 war shows that it is not only about who has the legitimate agency over the Falklands, there are other important factors which determine if or when the islands ’ population can exercise its self-determination. The doctrine of self-government is highly debatable and in some cases even unenforceable ; up to this date, the UN has not provided a definition of ‘ a people ’. Without a definition, how can anybody argue where self-government applies and where it does not ? Jennings, ( 1956:55-56 ) excellently stated that let the people decide is a noble idea but “ the people can not decide until person else decides who the people are ”. This paper illustrates that in the font of the Falklands, the key chemical element which allows the islanders to choose their way of life is the fact that they are supported by Britain ; it is hard to argue the right to self-government alone would secure the islands ’ population right to determine their political condition. This supports the realist kernel premise that “ the state-system operates in a context of external anarchy, in that there is no authority higher than the sovereign department of state ” ( Heywood, 2011:54 ). As noted in chapter two, the Falklands ’ war did not change the nature or the cogency of the claims made by Argentina or Britain, however, it has sincerely had an affect on the democratic hold towards each area ’ second stance on the topic and it will be difficult for a government on either side to reach a final settlement involving anything less than broad sovereignty without paying a gamey political price. It remains to be seen if recently elected Argentine president Macri ’ s change in the tone towards the islands supports the free belief that history moves towards increasing levels of progress and cooperation or, if alternatively, this is only a reverse, binding to the reign umbrella of the 1990s, until the following Argentine crisis erupts, supporting the realist precede that history just repeats itself, endlessly .
Appendix A –United Nations Resolutions/ 1994 Argentine Constitutional Amendment
A.1 – Most relevant sections of UN Resolution 1514 (UN, 1960a)
article 1 : “ The conquest of peoples to alien subjugation, domination and exploitation constitutes a denial of fundamental homo rights, is contrary to the Charter of the United Nations and is an hindrance to the promotion of worldly concern peace and co-operation ”
Article2 ; All peoples have the right to self-determination ; by merit of that right they freely determine their political condition and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development .
article 5 : immediate steps shall be taken, in Trust and Non-Self-Governing Territories or all other territories which have not even attained independence, to transfer all powers to the peoples of those territories, without any conditions or reservations, in accord with their freely expressed will and desire, without any distinction as to race, religious doctrine or color, in order to enable them to enjoy complete independence and exemption .
article 6 : Any undertake aimed at the partial or total dislocation of the national one and the territorial integrity of a country is inappropriate with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations .
A.2- Most relevant section of UN Resolution 1541 (UN, 1960b)
Principle VI states that: 
A Non-Self-Governing territory can be said to have reached a entire measure of self-government by :
( a ) emergence as a sovereign autonomous State ;
(b)  Free association with an independent State ; or
( c ) integration with an mugwump state .
A.3 – UN Resolution 2065 (UN, 1965)
“ The General Assembly invites the Governments of Argentina and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to proceed without delay with the negotiations recommended by the Special Committee on the Situation with respect to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples with a view to finding a peaceful solution to the problem, carriage in mind the provisions and objectives of the Charter of the United Nations and of General Assembly Resolution 1514 ( XV ) and the interests of the population of the Falkland Islands ( Malvinas ) .
A.4  – UN Resolution 502 (UN, 1982a)
The Security Council ,
Recalling the argument made by the President of the Security Council at the 2345th meet of the Security Council on 1 April 1982 ( S/14944 ) calling on the Governments of Argentina and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to refrain from the manipulation or threat of violence in the area of the Falkland Islands ( Islas Malvinas ) ,
deeply disturbed at reports of an invasion on 2 April 1982 by armed forces of Argentina ,
Determining that there exists a breach of the peace in the region of the Falkland Islands ( Islas Malvinas ) ,

1. Demands an immediate cessation of hostilities;
2. Demands an immediate withdrawal of all Argentine forces from the Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas);
3. Calls on the Governments of Argentina and the United Kingdom to seek a diplomatic solution to their differences and to respect fully the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations

A.5  – UN Resolution 505 (UN, 1982b)
The Security Council ,
Reaffirming its resolution 502 ( 1982 ) of 3 April 1982 ,
Noting with the deep concern that the situation in the region of the Falkland Islands ( Islas Malvinas ) has seriously deteriorated ,
Having heard the instruction made by the Secretary-General to the Security Council at its 2360th merging, on 21 May 1982, adenine well as the statements in the debate of the representatives of Argentina and of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ,
Concerned to achieve as a matter of the greatest importunity a cessation of hostilities and an end to the present conflict between the arm forces of Argentina and of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ,

1. Expresses appreciation to the Secretary-General for the efforts which he has already made to bring about an agreement between the parties, to ensure the implementation of Security Council resolution 502 (1982), and thereby to restore peace to the region;
2. Requests the Secretary-General, on the basis of the present resolution, to undertake a renewed mission of good offices bearing in mind Security Council resolution 502 (1982) and the approach outlined in his statement of 21 May 1982;
3. Urges the parties to the conflict to co-operate fully with the Secretary-General in his mission with a view to ending the present hostilities in and around the Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas);
4. Requests the Secretary-General to enter into contact immediately with the parties with a view to negotiating mutually acceptable terms for a cease-fire, including, if necessary, arrangements for the dispatch of United Nations observers to monitor compliance with the terms of the cease-fire;
5. Requests the Secretary-General to submit an interim report to the Security Council as soon as possible and, in any case, not later than seven days after the adoption of the present resolution.

A.6  –  Argentine constitution amendment- (Senado de la Nación Argentina, 1994)
“ The Argentine Nation ratifies its legalize and non-prescribing reign over the Malvinas, Georgias del Sur and Sandwich del Sur Islands and over the correspond nautical and insular zones, as they are an integral share of the National district .
The recovery of these territories and the full exercise of sovereignty, respecting the way of life for its inhabitants and according to the principles of external law, constitute a permanent wave and level finish of the Argentine people ”
Bibliography:
Aramburu, E. ( 2012 ). El status jurídico de los archipiélagos del Atlántico Sur en la Unión Europea según el Tratado de Lisboa . [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol :
Argüello, J. ( 2011 ). United Nations : “ The question of Malvinas ”, a pending motion. In : Romero, A. M. the Question of Malvinas Islands and the bicentennial of Argentina. Buenos Aires : Library of the National Congress. 66-81 .
Atanasof, A. ( 2011 ). Malvinas : the big challenge of the Argentine Congress in the year of the bicentennial. In : Romero, A. M. The Question of Malvinas Islands and the bicentennial of Argentina. Buenos Aires : Library of the National Congress. 18-23 .
Beck, P.J. ( 1988 ). The Falkland Islands as an international problem. New York : Routledge .
Bethlehem, D. ( 2014 ). The end of geography : The Changing nature of the International System and the Challenge to International Law. European Journal of International Law. 25 ( 1 ), 9-24 .
Buchanan, A. ( 2003 ). Justice, legitimacy and self-determination: moral foundations for international law. oxford university : Oxford University Press .
Bourantonis, D. ( 2005 ). The History and Politics of UN Security Council Reform. Oxon : Routledge
Burchill, S. and Linklater, A. ( 2009 ). insertion. In : Burchill, S., Linklater, A., Devetak, R., Donnelly, J., Nardin, T., Paterson, M. Reus-Smith, C., and True, J. Theories of International Relations. Hampshire : Palgrave MacMillan. 1-30 .
Calvert, P. ( 1982 ). The Falklands crisis: the rights and the wrongs. London : Frances Pinter ( Publishers ) Limited .
Carr, E. H. ( 1970 ). The 20 years’ crisis 1919-1939. An introduction to the study of International Relations. London : Macmillan and Co Ltd .
Carr, E.H. ( 1990 ). What is history ? Harmondsworth : Penguin Books .
Chehabi, H.E. ( 1985 ). self-government, Territorial Integrity, and the Falkland Islands. Political Science Quarterly. 100 ( 2 ), 215-225 .
Chueco, M. ( 1910 ). La República Argentina en su Primer Centenario. Tomo Segundo.Buenos Aires : Compañia Sud-Americana de Billetes de Banco .
Clarín. ( 2003 ). 2001: 5 presidentes en 10 días . [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //edant.clarin.com/suplementos/especiales/2003/12/10/l-00505.htm. last access 27/02/2016 .
Clarín. ( 2013 ). Tras el referéndum, Cristina llamó “consorcio de okupas” a los kelpers. [ on-line ] available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.clarin.com/politica/referendum-Cristina-consorcio-okupas-kelpers_0_881911828.html. last access 02/01/2016 .
Cohen, M. ( 2012 ). Argentina’s Economic Growth and Recovery: The Economy in a Time of Default. Oxon : Routledge .
Colling, R. ( 1999 ). Diego Garcia- Britain on the Dock. [ on-line ] available : hypertext transfer protocol : _Britain_in_the_dock/links/0deec535a124a7db57000000.pdf. last access 21/03/2016 .
Dabat, A. and Lorenzano, L. ( 1984 ). Argentina: the Malvinas and the end of military rule. Derby : Swanston Graphics Limited .
Daniel, H. and Ezpeleta, R.M.. ( 2013 ). Ambos lados: deconstructing identity, performing memory. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol :
Destefani, L. H. ( 1982 ). Malvinas, Georgias y Sandwich del Sur ante el conflicto con Gran Bretaña. Buenos Aires : Edipress .
Dodds, K. ( 2007 ). Falklands 25. The Rusi Journal. 152 ( 2 ), 82-87 .
Dodds, K. ( 2012 ). stormy waters : Britain, the Falkland Islands and UK-Argentina relations. International affairs. 88 ( 4 ), 683-700
Duncan, R., Jankar, B. and Switky, B. ( 2009 ). World Politics in the 21st Century. Boston : Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing ship’s company .
Elias, T.O. ( 1980 ). The Doctrine of Intertemporal Law. The American Journal of International Law. 74 ( 2 ), pp. 285-307 .
Escudé, C. ( 1984 ). La Argentina: ¿Paria Internacional? Buenos Aires : Editorial de Belgrano .
Escudé, C. ( 1986 ). La Argentina Vs. las grandes potencias. El precio del desafío . Buenos Aires : editorial de Belgrano.

Etchebarne Bullrich, C. ( 2000 ). ¿Malvinas o Falklands?. Buenos Aires : Grupo Editor Latinoamericano .
Falkland Islands Government. ( 2009 ). Falkland Islands Constitution. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.falklands.gov.fk/assembly/documents/The % 20Falkland % 20Islands % 20Constitution % 20Order % 202008.pdf. last access 02/01/2016 .
Fitte, E. J. ( 1974 ). La Agresión Norteamericana a Las Islas Malvinas. Buenos Aires : Emecé Editores .
Foreign Office ( 1862 ). British and Foreign State Papers 1848-1849. Vol. XXXVII. London : Harrison and sons. 7-11 .
Franks, O. ( 1983 ). Falkland Islands Review. London : Her Majesty ’ s Stationary Office .
Freedman, L. ( 2005 ). The Official history of the Falklands Campaign. Oxon : Routledge .
Garnett, M. and Lynch, P. ( 2012 ). Exploring British Politics. 3rd erectile dysfunction. essex : Pearson Education Limited .
Gil, S. ( 1999 ). Las islas Malvinas y la politica exterior Argentina durante los ‘90s: Acerca de su Fundamento Teórico y de la Concepción de una Política de Estado”. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.cari.org.ar/pdf/malvinas.pdf. stopping point accessed 28/01/2016
Gil, A. ( 2012 ). La Constitución es muy clara sobre Malvinas. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.clarin.com/opinion/Constitucion-clara-Malvinas_0_654534609.html. last access 28/01/2016 .
Goebel, J. ( 1982 ). The Struggle for the Falkland Islands. Bucks : Hazell Watson & Viney, Ltd .
Gonzalez, M. A. ( 2013 ). The genesis of the Falklands (Malvinas) conflict. Argentina, Britain and the failed negotiations of the 1960s. Hampshire : Palgrave Macmillan .
Griffiths, M. ( 2007 ). Worldviews and IR theory : Conquest or coexistence. In : Griffiths, M. International Relations Theory for the twenty-first century. An introduction. Oxon : Routledge .
Groussac. P. ( 1936 ). Las Islas Malvinas. Buenos Aires : Talleres gráficos Argentinos L. J. Rosso
Halliday, F. ( 1994 ). Rethinking International Relations. London : Macmillan Press Ltd .
Hastings, M. and Jenkins, S. ( 1983 ). The Battle for the Falklands. harlow : Hollen Street Press .
Hendrix, M. ( 2015 ). Argentina’s Economic Collapse Hints at What Might Be in Store for Greece. available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.nationalreview.com/article/420823/argentinas-economic-collapse-hints-what-might-be-store-greece-michael-hendrix. [ on-line ] last accessed 20/01/2016 .
Hensel, P., Allison, M. and Khanani, A. ( 2006 ). Territorial Integrity Treaties, Uti Possidetis, and Armed Conflict over Territory. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.paulhensel.org/Research/iowa06.pdf. stopping point accessed 15/01/2016
Heywood, A. ( 2011 ). Global politics. Hampshire : Palgrave MacMillan .
Hobsbawm, E. ( 2002 ). War and Peace. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol :  last access 08/02/2016 .
Honeywell, M. and Pearce, J. ( 1982 ). Falklands/ Malvinas: whose crisis?. Nottingham : Latin America Bureau .
Hope, A. F. J. ( 1983 ). Sovereignty and Decolonization of the Malvinas ( Falkland ) Islands. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review. 6 ( 2 ), 391-446 .
Huth, P. ( 2001 ). Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict. Michigan : University of Michigan .
Infojus. ( 1983 ). DENOMINACION DE “PUERTO ARGENTINO” A LA LOCALIDAD DE LAS ISLAS MALVINAS CONOCIDA COMO “PUERTO STANLEY”. available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.infojus.gob.ar/757-nacional-denominacion-puerto-argentino-localidad-islas-malvinas-conocida-como-puerto-stanley-dn19821000757-1982-04-16/123456789-0abc-757-0001-2891soterced. survive access 13/01/2016 .
Jenkins, S. ( 2013 ). How Margaret Thatcher’s Falklands gamble paid off . [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/apr/09/margaret-thatcher-falklands-gamble. last access 19/02/2016 .
Jennings, I. ( 1956 ). The Approach to Self-Government. cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
Kohen, G.M. ( 2006 ). Secession: International Law Perspectives. cambridge university : Cambridge university wardrobe .
La Nación. ( 2012 ). Una visión alternativa sobre la causa de Malvinas. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.lanacion.com.ar/1450787-una-vision-alternativa-sobre-la-causa-de-malvinas. last access 25/01/2016 .
Lanata, J. ( 2012 ). Lanata habló sobre el conflicto Malvinas. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v=E_UXVRco0xQ. last access 25/01/2016 .
Landaburu, C. A. ( 1989 ). La guerra de la Malvinas. Buenos Aires : Cirulo Militar .
Lanús, J.A. ( 2011 ). When the English doubted their rights. In : Romero, A. M. the Question of Malvinas Islands and the bicentennial of Argentina. Buenos Aires : Library of the National Congress. 94-105 .
La Prensa ( 1887 ). Plano General de Correos, Telégrafos y Ferrocarriles de la República Argentina. Buenos Aires : La Prensa
Latzina, F. ( 1883 ). La República Argentina como meta de emigración europea. Buenos Aires : La Union de Stiller y Laass .
Latzina, F. ( 1888 ). Geografía de la República Argentina. Buenos Aires : Felix Lajouane .
Leach, R, Coxall, B, and Robins, L. ( 2011 ). British Politics. 2nd erectile dysfunction. Hampshire : Palgrave MacMillan
Lindsey, J. M. ( 1983 ). Conquest : A legal and historical analysis of the root of United Kingdom Title in the Falkland Islands. Texas International Journal. 18 ( 11 ), 11-35 .
Maastricht University ( 2014 ). Discussion Panel on The Sovereignty Dispute over the Falklands / Malvinas: Competing Claims and Pros . [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v=hQSkZzCyEAE. last access 14/02/2016 .
Marroquín, A. ( 2014 ). The Falkland Islands : prosperity in the Face of Adversity. The Round Table: The Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs. 103 ( 4 ), 411-422 .
McElroy, D. ( 2013 ). ‘No such thing as Falkland islanders’, says Argentine foreign minister. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol :
MercoPress. ( 2011 ). Argentine election fever: minister accuses UK of keeping hostage “2000 Falklands’ Islanders”. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //en.mercopress.com/2011/06/29/argentine-election-fever-minister-accuses-uk-of-keeping-hostage-2000-falklands-islanders. last access 25/01/2016 .
Metford, J.C.J. ( 1982 ). Falklands or Malvinas ? The background of the quarrel. In : Goebel, J. The Struggle for the Falkland Islands. Bucks : Yale University .
Miller, V. ( 2012 ). Argentina and the Falkland Islands.  [ Online ] Available : researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN05602 end accessed 25/01/2016 .
Milmo, C. ( 2013 ). Falklands referendum: David Cameron calls on Argentina to respect the wishes of islanders after 99.8 per cent vote to stay British. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/falklands-referendum-david-cameron-calls-on-argentina-to-respect-the-wishes-of-islanders-after-998-8529669.html. stopping point access 02/02/2016 .
Milne, S. ( 2013 ). This isn’t self-determination. It’s a Ruritanian colonial relic. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/mar/12/falklands-vote-ruritanian-colonial-relic. last access 02/02/2016 .
Ministerio de Guerra ( 1905 ). Mapa de la division del territorio de la República Argentina en regiones militares. Buenos Aires : Boletín Militar del Ministerio de Guerra argentino .
Minuto Uno. ( 2013 ). “La ONU no reconoce el referendo de Malvinas “. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.minutouno.com/notas/282178-la-onu-no-reconoce-el-referendo-malvinas. death accessed 26/01/2016
Minuto Uno. ( 2016 ). Macri sobre Malvinas: “No renunciamos a lo que creemos nuestro, pero estamos dispuestos al dialogo”. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.minutouno.com/notas/1471858-macri-malvinas-no-renunciamos-lo-que-creemos-nuestro-pero-estamos-dispuestos-al-dialogo. last access 01/03/2016 .
Morgenthau, H. J. ( 1993 ). Politics Among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace. Boston : McGraw-Hill .
Muldoon, J. ( 1978 ). Papal Responsibility for the Infidel : Another look at Alexander VI ’ s “ Inter Caetera ”. The Catholic Historical Review. 64 ( 2 ), 168-184 .
New York Times. ( 1982 ). War in Falklands Cost Britain $1.19 Billion. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.nytimes.com/1982/10/27/world/war-in-falklands-cost-britain-1.19-billion.html. death access 19/03/2016 .
Niebieskikwiat, N. ( 2007 ). Malvinas: el Gobierno canceló el acuerdo petrolero con Gran Bretaña. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //edant.clarin.com/diario/2007/03/28/elpais/p-01001.htm. last access 24/01/2016 .
Niebieskikwiat, N. ( 2014 ). Kel?ers. Buenos Aires : column Sudamericana .
Nixon, M. ( 2013 ). Textbook on International Law. Hampshire : Ashford Colour Press Ltd .
Oosterveld, W., Spiegeleire, S. and Sweijs T. ( 2015 ). Pushing the Boundaries: Territorial Conflict in Today’s World. The Hague : The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies .
Palermo, V. ( 2007 ). Sal en las heridas. Las Malvinas en la cultura Argentina contemporánea. Buenos Aires : editorial Sudamericana .
Paz Soldán, M. ( 1888a ). Gobernación de la Tierra del Fuego y las Islas Malvinas. Buenos Aires : Felix Lajouane .
Paz Soldán, M. ( 1888b ). Mapa de los ferro-carriles, correos y telegrafos de la Republica Argentina.  Buenos Aires : Felix Lajouane .
Perfíl. ( 2015 ). Cuando Macri dijo que recuperar Malvinas sería “un fuerte déficit”. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.perfil.com/politica/Cuando-Macri-dijo-que-recuperar-Malvinas-seria-un-fuerte-deficit-20150403-0027.html concluding accessed 08/12/2015 .
Pilger, J. ( 1998 ). Hidden agenda. London : vintage .
Pilger, J. ( 2004 ). Stealing a Nation. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //johnpilger.com/videos/stealing-a-nation. last access 19/03/2016 .
Pittman, J. ( 2009 ). 21st Century Issues in America: An Introduction to Public Administration, theory and practice. Indiana : library of Congress .
Publicación oficial ( 1863 ). Colección de tratados celebrados por la República Argentina con las naciones extranjeras. Buenos Aires : Imprenta y litografía a vaporization de Bernheim y Boneo .
Reisman, W. M. ( 1983 ). The Struggle for the Falkland Islands. Faculty Scholarship Series. 93 ( 2 ), 287-318 .
Ruda, J. M. ( 2015 ). Alegato Ruda. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.mrecic.gov.ar/userfiles/documentos-malvinas/1964_-_alegato_ruda.pdf. last accessed 02/01/2016
Sawle, D. ( 2010 ). The challenge of sovereignty in smaller states. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.falklands.gov.fk/assembly/documents/The % 20Challenge % 20of % 20Sovereignty % 20in % 20small % 20states.pdf. last access 02/01/2016 .
Senado de la Nación Argentina. ( 1994 ). Constitución Nacional Argentina. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.senado.gov.ar/deInteresEnglish. last access 07/03/2016 .
Sharma, S. P. ( 1997 ). Territorial Acquisition, Disputes, and International Law. The Hague : Kluwer Law International .
Strange, I. ( 1981 ). The Falkland Islands. Devon : Redwood Burn Limited .
Taiana, J. ( 2011 ). The doubt of Malvinas in the year of the bicentennial. In : Romero, A. M. The Question of Malvinas Islands and the bicentennial of Argentina. Buenos Aires : Library of the National Congress. 30-33 .
The Referendum International Observation Mission ( RIOM ) ( 2013 ). The Falkland Islands Referendum. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.riom-mior.com/. survive access 25/01/2016 .
Toase, F. ( 2005 ). The United Nations Security Resolution 502. In : Badsey, S., Havers, R and Grove, M. The Falklands Conflict Twenty Years On. Lessons for the future . Oxon : Frank Cass. 147-169 .
Turpin, C. and Tomkins, A. ( 2007 ). British Government and the Constitution: Text and Materials. cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
United Nations. ( 1945 ). Charter of the United Nations. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.un.org/en/documents/charter/intro.shtml. last access 08/12/15 .
United Nations. ( 1948 ). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/. stopping point access 02/04/2016 .
United Nations. ( 1960a ). Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.un.org/en/decolonization/declaration.shtml. final accessed 02/04/2016
United Nations. ( 1960b ). Resolution 1541. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp ? symbol=A/RES/1541 ( XV ). concluding access 04/03/2016 .
United Nations. ( 1961 ). The United Nations and Decolonization. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.un.org/en/decolonization/specialcommittee.shtml. last accessed 02/01/2016
United Nations. ( 1965 ). Resolutions adopted on the reports of the Fourth Committee. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/218/28/IMG/NR021828.pdf ? OpenElement. final access 02/01/2016 .
United Nations. ( 1982a ). Resolution 502. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/435/26/IMG/NR043526.pdf ? OpenElement. last access 07/03/2016 .
United Nations. ( 1982b ). Resolution 505. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/435/29/IMG/NR043529.pdf ? OpenElement. end access 07/03/2016 .
United Nations. ( 2006 ). Reports on International Arbitral Awards. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //legal.un.org/riaa/cases/vol_XXI/53-264.pdf. last accessed 19/02/2016
United Nations. ( 2014 ). Statement by Mr Roger Edwards – Falkland Islands (Malvinas). [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.un.org/en/decolonization/pdf/CRP.16 % 20Falkland % 20Islands % 20 ( Malvinas ) .pdf. last access 09/01/2016 .
UNRWA. ( 2015 ). United Nations relief and works agency for Palestine refugees in the near east. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.unrwa.org/. final access 05/10/15 .
Viana, I. ( 2015 ). El fin de la guerra de Malvinas. Dos meses y 1.000 muertos despues. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.abc.es/20100614/archivo-historia-abc/guerra-malvinas-thatcher-galtieri-201006142020.html. last accessed 12/02/2016
Vidal, J. and Bowcott, O. ( 2012 ). Chagos Islanders forced into exile left ‘dumbstruck’ by court ruling. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.theguardian.com/world/2012/dec/20/chagos-islands-court-ruling. last access 21/03/2016 .
Villalobos, ( 1979 ). El Beagle, historia de una controversia. gran santiago : editorial Andrés Bello .
Vine, D. ( 2009 ). Island of Shame: The Secret History of the U.S. Military Base on Diego Garcia. Woodstock : Princeton University Press .
Wheaton, H. ( 1836 ). Elements on international law with a sketch of the history of the science. London : B. Fellowes .
Willetts, P. ( 2013 ). The United Nations, Self-Determination and the Falkland Islands. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol : //www.staff.city.ac.uk/p.willetts/SAC/COMMENTS/PW080313.PDF stopping point accessed 21/03/2016
YouGov. ( 2013 ). YouGov / Ibarómetro Survey Results. [ Online ] Available : hypertext transfer protocol :
Written by : Carlos Rodriguez
Written at : University of the West of Scotland
Written for : Fiona Veitch
Date written : April 2016

Further Reading on E-International Relations