Amber Heard Now Countersues New York Marine Insurance



Last we heard, Amber Heard was going to attempt to file for a dismissal of the NYM insurance because she was not a resident of California, or any state for that matter. Things seem to have changed.

Amber Heard has now filed her Answer to the NRM v Heard lawsuit, and added her own countersuit to that jurisidction.

Link To Amber Heard Answer & Countersuit:

If you are inclined, please send me a Super Sticker or here is my Paypal Tip Jar, and Thank You for your Support

Watch more new videos about Insurance | Synthesized by Mindovermetal English

Rate this post

Bài viết liên quan

Theo dõi
Thông báo của
guest
43 Comments
Cũ nhất
Mới nhất Được bỏ phiếu nhiều nhất
Phản hồi nội tuyến
Xem tất cả bình luận
Phyllis Thomas

Where is she getting the money from. We know she really wants to come back to the states but where is she getting the money

Em Carver

If she's suing the insurance companies for not paying her costs, whose paying for this one?

Carla Castillo

another great stream laura,you are amazing.

Ftm Rivas

I am just shocked that she keeps Getting away with so much

Slayer selections

The homeless and stateless claim was to go against the insurance as a last dash effort ???

Parakeet Floor

No way Amber would go after Elon Musk. He's not a nice guy like Johnny Depp and with his money and power would squash her like a bug. She's not very smart, but not that stupid.

Chi_ria18th

Another fantastic video Laura! Very informative and you break it down so it’s understandable. Keep up the fantastic work!! ❤

Nancy smith

Laura, my opinion agrees with your opinion 💯

Irene De Marco

OMG….
she prays for relief???
Within the document…

She shouldnt have preyed on Depp….! ! !

If she wasnt such a vindictive cow, her accusations of malice and fraud within her counterclaim would be laughable…
she tries to turn everything she does, her actions, into victimhood, when she is the perpetrator of all criminal assertions…

Pity its a civil case and not a criminal one…

She does not accept any responsibility for lying about falsely accusing JD of the most heinous act, that alone is fraud.

Manipulating physical evidence, ie photos, that is also fraudulent…

To my way of thinking, Travellers Insurance will win and she will lose her appeal.

She has committed so many duplicitous actions, that while civil, could be construed as criminal actions

She wont find legal support in any way, for what she has done, and continues to do…
She has breached so many laws, civil and criminal….

In the meantime, JD needs a protection order against her, she wont let this go, and some of her stans truly are demented, so JD,s safety could well be at risk….

Thanks Laura….
💞✌️🙏

FlopsyMopsy

She could not stay quiet and walk away. Vengeance is primary emotion of a narcissist

Pra ser bem sincera nem sei do que estão falando e muito menos do que se trata mas se eu não estiver errada eu acho que estão falando de Johnny deep Amber o mulherzinha perturbada que gosta de chamar a atenção de Johnny deep e de todo mundo me parece que ela quer ser o centro das atenções ela é ridícula mesmo eu espero que ela não apronte com o Johnny deep de novo ou invente mentiras absurdas contra ele tenho muita pena de pessoas assim como Amber pessoas de espírito podre e mal amada por todos.

Lisa Borries

Thanks you for your continued efforts on this case!

Lisa Borries

Thank you, Laura! Quick Qu: who is the baby napping? Guess I haven’t picked on that before. 😊

Miss April

"She'll hit the wall real hard" and she has!!! She just doesn't know when to quit. She doesn't know when to stop. She hates being held accounts for her actions. She defamed Johnny with malicious intent but she expects an insurance company to pay for that?? Like you did this all yourself.

Liz Bird

1a. Travellers v NY Marine
1b. Counter NY Marine v Travellers
2a. NY Marine v AH
2b. Counter AH v NY Marine
3a. AH v Travellers
3b. Will Travellers Counter?

1+2 were combined for discovery, so will 3 now be added to the ❤ 🔺️

And do you think the trial will now be combined also 🤔?

Boom Her

Hypocrisy is contagious.

Don't preach about how big of hypocrites everyone else is when you are just as bad.

https://youtu.be/tzl1KF0bmLA

jorazz16

I just had a flashback overlay trying to use the fact that poor ah had to put all this money out for lawyers.( AH said it too).
Meanwhile insurance was paying for it.
I am not a lawyer I don't know the law but it seems to me that Elaine was just sitting up there lying. The trickery and lies they had to be done the name of AH, in itself screams she was not truthful, and destroyed a man's life over lies.
In my opinion😉✌

Laura Morales

I don't feel sorry for Amber. She started this horror show

Dave Cooke

She doesn’t have to write up anything , her lawyers are doing it,she does nothing

Thomas Williams

Amber's claimed she's penniless, yet is living large overseas, and now is paying more for attorney time on frivolous claims/counters wasting what money she does have AND owes Johnny.

It amazes me that, as she increases her legal exposure, Johnny's team doesn't file a request changing their opinion regarding the need for a surety bond to the court. They should force her to cover her pre-existing debt to Johnny and/or place her accounts and estate under a count-ordered oversight.

Mary Bradley

Andrea Burkhart explains why the bond does not need to be put up now very well

John Beard

She must love being in court.

Chris Pyves

The longer this goes on the more this looks like an insurance scam that Travellers seem too willing to pay over inflated legal costs without asking any questions. Hats off to NY Marine for calling them out.

Teri Scheiding

My opinion AH had something to do with the money JD lost!

Liz Diehl

Thanks Laura for the update! We appreciate you 🙂

Ja Co

I believe the UN has quietly distanced themselves from Heard. She's no longer listed as an UN ambassador on their website. No point in them making a public statement tbh, she's not known well enough for her work with them.
Also, if I remember correctly, AH testified that her L'oreal contract was extended from November 2021 for another 20 months, so until July 2023. Until then, they're contractually obligated to keep her (she's still listed on their website as an ambassador) and I'm guessing they'll do so as not to risk being sued by her for wrongful termination of contract. However, I doubt that they'll extent the contract again since by then, they will've been paying god knows how much money for her without getting anything in return.

Toni Marie

Good faith works both ways.

JR R

I'm sure the insurance company that's suing Heard has paid way more for this lawsuit then just giving the million to her. But at this point its about the principle of the matter. .

Carla

What baffeles me again , have become a pro baffeler at this point :p, a while ago she tried to get out of lawsuits for herself by not have an adress of her, so how is it possible that she is able to sue ??? One thing is sure by now or should be , whatever this creature does or is involved in is going to be messed up.

snarl

AH claims the judgement in VA isn't final. Didn't Judge Azcarate issue the final judgement at the end of June?

Toni Marie

Didnt she breach the contract 1st.. by creating the liability? Doesnt that negate the contract?

Toni Marie

She appears to have removed herself from CEO and Executive officer from her own production company now.. she is taking her name off her assets at
Under the black sky inc..

GothBoy UK

One of the things I would be doing, if I was an insurer, would be to find out AH's entire previous insurance history. If she regularly buys an annual defamation-specific insurance policy then that's one thing, but if she only bought it for one year (the one she knew would cover the Op-Ed) then I'd heavily argue there was a premeditated intent to use the policy (what we'd call deliberate misrepresentation in the UK). That should be enough to trigger the California invalidation clause – she knew she was going to conduct defamation with malice within the policy period. It'll all come out in the wash, as they say. 🖤

Toni Marie

I doubt that the policy proviso's included ' you can commit defamation and we will pay for it'. She is collecting rope with every move.. giving her enough rope is the best thing we can do. The fallout will be huge.. and not anyone else's fault…

M M

The reason she said that she'd donate the money was that so Johnny would lose the UK trial. The judge said that it's not an action of a gold digger. That's how it all went against him.

Caroline Brown

Replay crew from Australia.Aussie overlawd put out that ‘someone’ wanted more time to review documents before they could be released under freedom of information. 😒

Naruto Uzumaki

So if NewYorkMarine insured her via her company, that apparently also covers DV? Ain't that a bit weird?

vic Leomant

another whole industry that wish they’d never ‘heard’ her name (film, legal, insurance,) 😂 – wonder whose next….

Simply Me

Every defamation insurance policyEXCLUDES “intentional or malicious acts” unless her article was written as an “unintentional accident or situation” she is SOL 😂😂😂😂

Simply Me

I love the “reservation of rights” by NYMarine because even though they started to help in her defense (by reservation of rights) they still retained their right to later deny her claim.

Simply Me

AH can say whatever but unless you read the full terms of the actual insurance contract (including the inclusions and exclusions) she’s just blowing smoke

Simply Me

Also insurance companies, in terms of the insurance contract, can stipulate the right to select the lawyers (which sounds like NYMarine did) then by her NOT utilizing the lawyer THEY supplied – when AH decided to use her own lawyers instead of those supplied by NYMarine AH technically voided the insurance contract she had with NYMarine

Simply Me

Most (not all) insurance policies such as this agree to pay towards defense only but rarely do they agree to pay any judgement amounts if the insured is found liable. (Some do include judgement payments though) Most include a clause that if the insured is found liable for intentional actions then the insurance would not pay anything.