The Bill to Remove Suppressors from the National Firearms Act



Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, discusses House Resolution 95, sponsored by Rep. Jeff Duncan, R. South Carolina. If enacted into law, HR 95 would remove suppressors/silencers from the purview of the National Firearms Act of 1934. Suppressors were added to the NFA in 1986. Under current law, a person who wishes to acquire and possess a silencer, must jump through several ATF channels and pay a $200 tax stamp for each NFA item. This bill would remove these items from these requirements and FFLs would treat them much the same way as they do with any other firearm you complete a Form 4473 for. What exactly does this bill do, how does it do it and what are the chances it becomes law? Learn more and arm yourself with education today.
___________________________________________________________________
Applicable Statutes/Bills:

HR 95.

Full Text HR 95.

The National Firearms Act.
________________________________________________________________
Other Resources:

Is the ATF Doing Away With All Form 1s?

Bullet Points. Owning a Suppressor in Washington State.

Are Suppressors Legal in Washington State?

Check Out our Bullet Point Series.
_____________________________________________________________________
Subscribe to us on Patreon. www.patreon.com/WashingtonGunLaw

Remember, you can follow us at www.washingtongunlaw.com

Like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/WashingtonGunLaw

Follow us on Twitter @GunWashington

Watch more new videos about Law | Synthesized by Mindovermetal English

Rate this post

Bài viết liên quan

Theo dõi
Thông báo của
guest
20 Comments
Cũ nhất
Mới nhất Được bỏ phiếu nhiều nhất
Phản hồi nội tuyến
Xem tất cả bình luận
BrandoFPV

A supressor isnt a firearm. you should be able to buy it with nothing but some cash.

Dreaded Raider

Better outlaw oil filters.

I'm an Idahoan. Imma do what I want when I want with what I want.

Timmy Rickets

"you now to pay a $200 tax stamp 50 hours of training to get a license and a one year waiting period in order to speak." – Democrats 2030

Michael Rennie

Liked and subscribed, great video. Thank you!

Jerome Truitt

Hearing Protection Act is the PERFECT name for this bill.

The1Marine1

Defund the NFA. Dissolve this agency.

Persian Fantasy

gaeng gaeng

Brady Webb

The idiots that put restrictions on supressors, CLEARLY watch too many movies, and have never heard an actual firearm with one on fire…

TOP SECRET CLOWN BUSINESS

Civil war thats whats coming .

10MM

If this bill goes through and they become accessible what does that do for somebody who has filed all the paperwork for one and is currently waiting.

David Smith

I think my Rep. Bob Good has been pushing for this Hearing Protection Act since he was elected a few years ago..Thank you Bob !

dande tande

Who doesnt shoot alot , doesnt understand how much this will save your hearing!!!

Stephen Mahon

Silencers , just like pinning the stock in NJ IS RIDICULOUS!! So having 3 kids , which everyone might have an different arm length to comfortably handle rifle. I would have to buy 5 AR RIFLES , instead of 1 , that could be adjusted to fit everyone shooting the rifle .

Stevie Ray

Would love them to come try n take mine. I havent had any moving targets to shoot at in awhile.

Josh S

A bill to remove suppressors while there a bill to remove all firearms from us🤔 lol

Aaron C.

This would be a nice win.

FOMO MOFO

I don’t see the atf destroying records of suppressors. They have illegal records of firearm owners now.

PaulineRoy Adair

Suppressors are hearing protection ! you don't have to pay $200 tax on earmufs or ear plugs.

Steve Slater

It's still unconstitutional

s1lenceblade

The first time I heard this bill referenced, it was called the S.H.U.S.H. (Silencers Help Us Save Hearing) Act.