Fishing for Space: Fine-Scale Multi-Sector Maritime Activities Influence Fisher Location Choice

Abstract

The European Union and other states are moving towards Ecosystem Based Fisheries Management to balance food production and security with wide ecosystem concerns. fishing is only one of several sectors operating within the ocean environment, competing for renewable and non-renewable resources that overlap in a limit outer space. other sectors include marine mine, energy generation, refreshment, tape drive and conservation. Trade-offs of these competing sectors are already part of the process but attempts to detail how the seas are being utilised have been chiefly based on compilations of data on homo activity at big spatial scales. Advances including satellite and embark automatic rifle tracking enable investigation of factors influencing fishers ’ choice of fishing grounds at spatial scales relevant to decision-making, including the presence or avoidance of activities by other sectors. We analyse the determinants of English and Welsh scallop-dredging evanesce behaviour, including competing sectors, operating in the eastern English Channel. Results indicate sum mine natural process, maritime traffic, increased fish costs, and the English inshore 6 and french 12 nautical mile limits negatively affect fishers ’ likelihood of fishing in differently suitable areas. Past achiever, net-benefits and fish within the 12 NM predispose fishers to use areas. taxonomic conservation planning has even to be widely applied in marine systems, and the dynamics of spatial overlap of fishing with other activities have not been studied at scales relevant to fisher decision-making. This sketch demonstrates fisher decision-making is indeed affected by the real-time presence of other sectors in an area, and consequently trade-offs which need to be accounted for in marine planning. As marine resource origin demands escalate, governments will need to take a more proactive overture to resolving these trade-offs, and studies such as this will be required as the evidential foundation for future seascape plan .
Citation: Tidd AN, Vermard Y, Marchal P, Pinnegar J, Blanchard JL, Milner-Gulland EJ ( 2015 ) Fishing for Space : Fine-Scale Multi-Sector Maritime Activities Influence Fisher Location Choice. PLoS ONE 10 ( 1 ) : e0116335. hypertext transfer protocol : //doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116335 Academic Editor: Jan Geert Hiddink, Bangor University, UNITED KINGDOM Received: July 13, 2014 ; Accepted: December 5, 2014 ; Published: January 27, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Tidd et alabama. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original writer and source are credited Data Availability: The data used in the study are the place of the follow organisations : Department for Environment and Rural Affairs, Royal Haskoning, Maritime Coastguard Agency, Institut Français de Recherche pour l ’ exploitation de la Mer, Department of Energy and Climate Change. The data are confidential in nature and the lector would have to seek access by writing to the organisations mentioned above. An government price for the data, clauses specifying terms of data use and a datum confidentiality agreement should be expected. All requests for data can be sent to the follow organization listed below. 1. Royal Haskoning ; hypertext transfer protocol : //www.royalhaskoningdhv.com/en-gb/united-kingdom/contact-us. 2. Department for Environment and Rural Affairs ( Defra ) ; Marine and Fisheries Evidence Unit, Defra, Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London SW1P 3JR ; 3. Maritime Coastguard Agency ( MCA ) : spring home, 105 commercial Road, Southampton SO15 1EG ; 4. Department of Energy and Climate Change ( DECC ) ; 3 Whitehall Place, London SW1A 2AW ; 5. Institut Français de Recherche pour fifty ’ exploitation de la Mer ( IFREMER ) : 150 Quai Gambetta, 62200 Boulogne-sur-Mer, France. Funding: The inquiry leading to these results has received financing from the European Union ’ s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technical development and demonstration ( FP7/2007–2013 ) within the Ocean of Tomorrow call under Grant Agreement No.266445 for the project Vectors of Change in Oceans and Seas Marine Life, Impact on Economic Sectors “ ( VECTORS ) “ and Cefas United Kingdom ( Project Cefas Seedcorn ). The funders had no function in study blueprint, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist .

Introduction

As homo population emergence continues to increase there is a need to balance competing demands for lifelike resources. traditionally seen as a common property resource, the sea is confronted increasingly with competition for outer space by competing sectors, e.g. fisheries, anoint and boast exploitation, aggregate extraction, scent energy, ship and transport, diversion, dumping and the military activities. Spatial plan and the regulation of human activities and pressures at sea are therefore becoming a concern, particularly given that some resources are limited in space and quantity. Since 2008, the European Union has placed a province on member states to achieve coarse principles based on the “ Roadmap for spatial planning ” [ 1 ], which falls under the Integrated Maritime Policy ( IMP ; [ 2 ] ), and is generally referred to as Maritime Spatial Planning ( MSP ). The objectives of MSP are to manage anthropogenetic activities in distance and time, precluding or minimising conflicts between competing sectors without negatively impacting the ecosystem, operating within the Marine Strategy Framework Directive ( MFSD ; [ 3 ] ). however, because sectors at sea can change quickly and the complexities of lifelike systems are linked and inter-reliant, a management decision for one sector may affect others, and MSP needs to be treated as a process of continuous, adaptive management process .
Given the importance of MSP, respective writers have stressed the importance of fleet-based spatial management in the commercial fisheries sector [ 4 ], [ 5 ], accounting for different fleet activities at a scale fine adequate to be integrated into the MFSD process. To date, consolidation has been unmanageable owing to the wide scale ( ICES statistical rectangle ∼900 nautical miles2 ) at which some data ( e.g. landings ) are reported. With the emergence of Vessel Monitoring Systems ( VMS ) over the past decade, however, MSP is now potentially possible at a fine scale. Issues of data confidentiality between penis states have hampered the use of this information, and there is besides a historic reluctance of fishers to provide accurate landings information for fear of conceding cognition of profitable fishing grounds [ 6 ], and that the information might be used against their interests by other authorities. For example [ 7 ] suggested that fishers are concerned that conservationists might identify generative fishing grounds as desirable for Marine Protected Areas ( MPAs ), or fisheries managers might implement tighter enforcement constraints. In the light of the limit data handiness and confidentiality, fisheries managers are looking now for option approaches to assist spatial planning, which will reduce implementation error i.e. where the effects of management disagree from that intended [ 8 ] .
One such access involves anticipating fisherman behavior in reaction to regulation. Fisher behavior can not be predicted with certainty because of the many factors which influence where and when a fisher will operate. however, if managers can better anticipate fisher behavior, then they may be able to reduce the unanticipated side-effects of management actions aimed both at the fishery sector and at other sectors. traditional fisheries management treats fishers as electrostatic and homogeneous with no consideration of their behavior and person aims [ 9 ], [ 10 ]. holocene studies have applied random utility model ( RUM ) methodology [ 11 ] – [ 13 ] to this issue, because such models offer an opportunity to study individual behavior at a fine scale of space and time than previous approaches [ 14 ] .
The aim of the portray study was to model the key determinants of where fishers choose to fish, building on retrospective time-series and including interactions with a selection of winder sectors besides competing for space in the area. In this study we acquired data for the English and Welsh scallop-dredging fleet operate in the eastern English Channel ( ICES Division VIId ) and these fleets form the basis of our case study. This area besides contains one of the busiest ship lanes in the world, the route between the Atlantic Ocean and the North Sea, which we hypothesise might have a minus affect on commercial fishers. There are besides several active marine sum origin sites and fishers have expressed concerns about the accumulation of such sites and the consequence of fishing coerce concentrating elsewhere for fear of gear damage, and the sustainability of pisces stocks that are already heavily exploited in these areas [ 15 ]. The fish restrictions in the area consist of local English bylaw prohibiting beam trawlers of > = 300 horsepower or 70 crying registered tons from the 12 mile belt of sovereign waters around the English coast to restrict competition with the inshore sole fishing fleet ( Fig. 1 ). This rule besides prevents fishing by any international fishing vessel, though the area can be used for condom passage. There is a foster 6 nautical mile restricted zone to assist inshore vessels by prohibiting some fishing vessels of size > 14m ( depending on which regional Inshore Fishery and Conservation Area—IFCA they fall under ) and limitations on scallop vessels with a certain number of dredges. Most of the vessels operating in the area are small ( < 10 thousand ) inshore boats that deploy gillnets, trawl, longlines, traps and pots, and target sole ( Solea solea ), plaice ( Pleuronectes platessa ), gull ( Gadus morhua ), bass ( Dicentrarchus labrax ) and some skates and rays ( Rajidae ; [ 16 ] ) .

• PPT PowerPoint slide
• PNG larger trope
• bicker original image

download :

Figure 1.

Spatial lap of sectors ( color pixels represent nautical traffic densities, chummy and thin white lines the12 and 6 mile limits respectively, aggregate mining sites ( labelled ) and the smash black channel proposed extra Areas of Conservation ) within the english Channel. hypertext transfer protocol : //doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116335.g001 A interracial logit RUM was developed to analyse the determinants of fisherman behavior at a all right scale using English and Welsh VMS datum. This model evaluates the consequence of the identify potential competing sectors on fishing demeanor. Suggestions are then made as to how the method acting can be used in integrate MSP in anticipation of the electric potential administration of Special Areas of Conservation ( SACs ) in the sphere as part of UK commitments to the EU ’ sulfur Habitats Directive [ 17 ] or Marine Conservation Zones ( MCZs ) under the UK Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 .

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

I confirm that the generator adhered to general guidelines for the ethical use of humans and animals .

The UK scallop fleet

The UK scallop ( Pecten maximus ) diligence is one of the UKs most valuable fisheries and was valued at > £66.9 million ( 58000 tonnes ), £16 million in the Channel alone in 2012 [ 18 ], employing > 13000 people in the catch sector and 17 000 in the work sector [ 19 ]. Scallops are fished in one of three ways, dredging, trawling and hand-diving. Dredging is the most common method acting ( 95 % of king scallops landed in UK are caught using dredges [ 20 ] and 2–4 % of king scallops are hand collected by divers, [ 21 ] ). Scallop dredges consist of a heavy alloy frame with a chain mesh and a set of spring-loaded teeth pointed downwards to assist in raking out the scallops into the dredge ’ s range mesh topology. These dredges are connected to a beam, which in turn is connected to warps that are towed over the seabed by the fish vessel. queen scallops ( Aequipecten opercularis ) are typically caught in much the same way however queen scallops are active swimmers and fishers are able to engage in trawling for them during seasonal king scallop dredging restrictions .
unevenness in landings and in count of vessels operating, resulting from fluctuations in good recruitment, market demand, regulations and more recently fuel price, are common features of scallop fisheries. Generally current management of scallop fisheries is through minimal down sizes and the numbers of dredges regulated by local ocean fisheries committees, as there are no catch limitations. The UK scallop-dredging flit is said to be mobile in nature, moving around the UK coast to fish wherever scallop abundance is best and operating there until those grounds become economically non-viable. They then return a few years late when stocks there have recovered [ 19 ]. In holocene years, there has been an increase in the number of vessels operating in the eastern English Channel fishery. This may partially be due to more qualify fish opportunities elsewhere, such as in Cardigan Bay [ 22 ], but besides the Prohibition of Fishing for Scallops ( Scotland ) holy order 2003 banning the use of more than 14 dredges per side anywhere in scottish waters [ 23 ] hence displacing larger vessels which use a greater number of dredges to other locations. however Defra [ 19 ] suggest that this increase is predominantly among the larger ( ≥15 molarity long ), more herculean, vessels and is besides due to an increase in scallop abundance resulting from enhanced recruitment .

Data

The UK ’ s Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs ( Defra ) database for fish activity and the fleet register were used to select commercial landing and vessel data from the English and Welsh flit ( excluding Scottish and Northern Irish data due to confidentiality issues ). individual trip data for commercial scallopers were collated for the years 2005–2010. The data collected for each vessel included species landed, hours fished, landed weight per ICES statistical rectangle ( kilogram ), calendar month of fishing, year of fish and total value of the catch by species, vessel and trip. Within the EU, it is presently only a necessity for vessels > 10 m long to submit logbooks, but the database besides contains a subset of catch from < 10 meter vessels that historically reported their catches . methodology for the definition of fleets was based on the european Commission ’ s Data Collection Regulation ( DCR ; [ 24 ] ). VMS monitor in the European Union [ 25 ], [ 26 ] has been in place since 2000, initially for fishing vessels of ≥24 thousand retentive, post-2005 for vessels ≥15 m long, and in 2012 ≥12 thousand retentive. The data are required by regulative authorities for vessel monitor purposes ( and present, increasingly for scientific inquiry ) and are characterised by a ping every 2h giving position, course and rush. Over the past few years, authors such as [ 27 ], [ 28 ] and [ 29 ] have described methods to determine fish or steaming activities from unprocessed VMS data. No individual method acting has been adopted as definitive, so the datum for the years 2005–2010 were processed as described by [ 28 ]. Logbook datum and VMS fishing records were combined by vessel and ICES rectangle, forming a detailed dataset of fishing bodily process. The ICES rectangle was far formatted into 200 ( 3′ × 3′ ) squares and all the coordinates from the VMS data were assigned into these spatial units . Marine diesel prices, excluding value-added tax and duty, were obtained from the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change. Aggregate-extraction intensity data by month for the years 2005–2010 were obtained from the UK ’ s Royal Haskoning and the Institut Français de Recherche pour fifty ’ Exploitation de la Mer. Shipping/transport traffic information was obtained from the Automatic Identification System ( AIS ) of the UK Maritime Coastguard Agency. UK 6-mile and french 12-mile limits were added to the nautical activities dataset because it was thought that contest for space with the local anesthetic inshore fleet would be an charm component .

The model

Having populated the dataset with all covariates, we developed a mix RUM to determine the key determinants of fisher behavior in relation to competing sectors and fishing-specific covariates. We hypothesise that key competing sectors of activeness equally well as fish costs ( i.e. fuel monetary value ) negatively impact the spatial coverage of fishing operations ( as presented in Fig. 2 ), in contrast to expected vpue and past campaign ( cognition or substance abuse ) which positively influence fishing operations. Pioneering research by [ 30 ], [ 31 ] on the manipulation of discrete choice and economics methodologies demonstrated the relationship between utility maximization and discrete choice, where utility influences individual choice with a deterministic and stochastic error component. RUM derives its list from discrete utility maximization and assumes that the choices are random to the analyst. A shuffle logit choice RUM was implemented because it relaxes the non-IIA ( Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives ) assumptions associated with preference heterogeneity among fishers. This approach is effective in dealing with empanel data for repeated individual choices, as is the encase within this discipline. For a detail explanation of assorted logit, see [ 32 ] and [ 33 ]. succinctly, the sum utility μnjt of fisher newton for site j in trip metric ton is ( 1 ) where β′n xnjt represents the observe utility and ϵnjt is the erroneousness distribution that is part-correlated and part independently and identically distributed ( iid ) over alternatives and individuals [ 31 ], [ 34 ]. Within the desegregate logit framework, βn was assumed to follow a normal distribution, and for a given measure of normality ( for simplicity disregarding t ), the conditional probability of choice joule across all other choices j = 1 to J is estimated by drawing random values β by simulation using ( 2 ) where βn is a vector of coefficients that varies across individuals, and xnj is a vector of the attributes of each of the choices made. All covariates met the normality assumption following log-transformation. The analysis on 3019 observations was carried out in the SAS box PROC MDC [ 35 ] using quasi-Newton optimization and 100 Halton withdraw .

• PPT PowerPoint slither
• PNG larger trope
• bicker original image

download :

Figure 2.

The easterly English Channel displaying entire annual scallop dredging campaign densities in hours fished ( bootleg pixels = 200 hours ). hypertext transfer protocol : //doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116335.g002

The definition of choice set

When designing RUMs, fisheries scientists are confronted with the trouble of creating a option set, which covers the individual sites to which a fisherman travels to fish. If sites are besides small ( individual latitude/longitude positions ), there may not be sufficient site-specific information, but if they are besides big, authoritative site-specific information can be lost when aggregating, losing information valuable to policy-makers. Fishers have anterior cognition of resource distribution and habitat [ 36 ], [ 37 ], and scallops are relatively static mollusk, suggesting that in future years, any choice set will be subject to relatively little change. On the footing of this premise, the predetermine area making up the choice set for this study was based on the 2005–2010 attempt distribution of scallop dredgers plotted from the VMS records ( Fig. 2 ). A tradeoff in scale was necessity so the dataset was grouped into 45 sub-rectangles, determining the choice fructify ( Fig. 3 ). Having excessively many specific choices can reduce the stability of standard algorithm for maximal likelihood estimate as the issue of alternatives rises past around 50 due to data multicolinearity [ 38 ] .

• PPT PowerPoint skid
• PNG larger image
• bicker master image

download :

Figure 3.

The easterly English Channel with ICES rectangles overlie and the choice set represented by the hatching geo-referenced by ICES rectangle and the eight sub-rectangles within. hypertext transfer protocol : //doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116335.g003

Variable selection

internet benefit or profit per rig of fishing trips is not easily computed as detailed cost data ( varying and fixed ) is dearly-won to collect and such confidential data is not normally disclosed. Researchers therefore use a proxy of value per unit attempt ( vpue ) quite than monetary value, which relates to the final benefit of variations in stock concentration [ 39 ], [ 11 ]. Value per choice was calculated as a proportion of the sum value ( revenues from landings ) per ICES rectangle based on campaign ( hours fished ) derived from the VMS, and vpue was then computable. The average vpue by year, calendar month and location was calculated for the fleet and lagged both by calendar month and per annum to take report of spatial fluctuations at unlike temporal role scales. The by percentage of a particular vessel ’ sulfur scallop trips to a fish location as a share of the fleet total elsewhere was used to represent fisher habit/experience and to track the seasonal worker nature of the fishery, as in [ 40 ], and was besides lagged as above .
Where possible, fishers are assumed to maximise their returns [ 41 ]. Subject to the weather and other factors, they trade off change of location costs against the quality of the fishing grounds. A proxy for perceive costs was calculated based on the average fleet distance to landing port from VMS fishing locations, calculated using the Haversine formula [ 42 ], weighted by mean median fuel price from fishing in the same placement in the same month of the previous year fishing ( i.e. lag average costs ). [ 43 ] view of fishers in the south west of England showed that fishers routinely keep track of fuel prices in order to forecast their electric potential earnings after deductions for other costs. Landing port was used as it was assumed that the fishers would have prior cognition of seasonal market prices in the proximity of fishing locations .
Aggregate mining activeness enters the model as the average share coverage of this mining natural process in the location the previous calendar month ( to capture potential by action as a pain to fishing operations ). The 6 mile limit ( as a proxy for the English restricted partition for certain vessels over 14m ) and the 12-mile restrict ( as a proxy for the french internationally restricted zone ) were treated as a spatial restraint. Maritime traffic was included as average hours in which a location was occupied by marine shipping traffic in the previous month. last, as a proxy for congestion and social influence effects, we included the average hours fished the previous calendar month by English, French and other ( nameless fishers grouped ) fishing vessels. The variable selection set was merged with individual cutlet trip data by year, calendar month and location, such that for every trip, the decision-maker had a choice of the specified 45-subrectangles ( table 1 ). Based on the historic time-series of VMS data, fishing bodily process was ascribed to a particular sub-rectangle, and values took a measure of 1 if a location was selected or 0 otherwise It is crucial to note that for any particular vessel and any given trip, a count of observations may exist in a phone number of different sub-rectangles, hence each choice is considered individually as components within a fishing slip ) .

• PPT PowerPoint slide
• PNG larger image
• bicker master image

download : postpone 1. Definition of variables used in the RUM to model fisher location choice for the 45 ICES sub-rectangles in the eastern English Channel as defined in definition of variables used in the RUM to model fisher location choice for the 45 ICES sub-rectangles in the eastern English Channel as defined in Fig. 3 hypertext transfer protocol : //doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116335.t001

Sensitivity analysis

To test the sensitivity to different variables the mean choice probabilities were calculated from the model output and then compared with intend choice probabilities after re-running the exemplary under alternative scenarios where each varying was doubled/halved one at a meter. The differences in probability of location choice, under each of these scenarios, show the magnitude of the consequence on location choice and how sensible the variables are to changes i.e. how the variables that penalise fishing operations ( e.g. aggregate origin, marine traffic, and fuel costs ) affect fishers, in contrast to expected vpue which should encourage fishing operations .

Results

The mix model showed a McFadden ’ s pseudo-R 2 of 0.19, suggesting a very dear fit [ 44 ]. theoretically, the range for McFadden ’ s pseudo-R 2 is between 0 and 1, but the general rule of hitchhike is that any value from 0.2 to 0.4 suggests an excellent fit, comparable to an ordinary least squares ( OLS ) R 2 of 0.7–0.9 [ 45 ] .
All desegregate exemplar coefficients were statistically significant ( phosphorus < 0.01 ) except the coefficient for the average vpue of scallop from fishing in the lapp placement in the same calendar month as in the previous year and the proxy for congestion/social influence in the former month of the current year for the french evanesce ( table 2 ). The calculate standard deviations of the estimates were not significantly different from the mean ( indicating that the parameters do not vary significantly in the population of fishers ) for past vpue, price, average percentage coverage by nautical traffic and median hours occupied by fishing action by English/other fishing vessels. conversely, the feat to the localization in the previous month in the stream class, the average percentage coverage by aggregate bodily process and the average effort in the same calendar month the former year did vary, possibly relating to variations in characteristics of the fishers not captured in the model .

• PPT PowerPoint slither
• PNG larger double
• bicker original image

download :

Table 2.

Estimated argument values, where the dependent varying took a value of 1 if a option was made or 0 differently.

hypertext transfer protocol : //doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116335.t002 The campaign distribution maps in Fig. 2, coupled with the exemplary results ( table 2 ) show how the scallop dredges interact with the ship traffic separation schema, aggregates and fisheries outside the english 6 and french 12-mile limits. In general the mean coefficients show the signs one would expect : english scallop fishers are negatively affected by the english 6 and french 12 sea mile restrictions, deoxyadenosine monophosphate well as sum activity and marine traffic. Despite this, in every year of the study there was a large measure of fishing campaign in these areas, even more so in 2010 within the high-traffic area, possibly because of a tradeoff with larger expected vpue in these areas. There is a significant plus influence of vpue in the previous month on the tactics of fishers, but not of vpue in the lapp month of the previous year, which strongly suggests in-year unevenness is the key driver of behavior. In contrast, cost was a veto influence as expected. by feat variables, which were included to depict habit or cognition of past success of fishing grounds, have positive coefficients, suggesting they are significant drivers of fisher location option .
As part of a ‘ what if analysis ’ a series of numeric simulations revealed that fishers responded to a 50 % decrease in % area covered by aggregate origin differently depending on the spatial position of the natural process. In an sphere close to shore associated with aggregate extraction ( 30E9G ), there was a relatively large deviation in probability of fishing, of +0.012, while there were small obtrusive increases in nearby areas 30E9F and 29F0C. Doubling the coverage of aggregate extraction resulted in fishers moving out of these locations ( notably these same areas, 30E9G, 30E9F and 29F0C ) with a change of probability of −0.018, −0.012 and −0.004 respectively. Fishers moved into a more offshore locate of existing extraction ( 29F0B ), which recently has contained very high fishing feat, with a change in probability of +0.014. These observations suggest that aggregate mine activity heavily influences fisher decision cause, possibly due to knowledge of the habitat that scallops live in, coupled with past know ( Fig. 2 ) .
Most of the main scallop grounds are located within interfering marine dealings areas ( Fig. 2 ) and consequently one would expect that with a decrease in traffic saturation there would be less contest for space and fishers would move into these areas. Maritime traffic, however, showed relatively small effects. Doubling the coefficient of nautical traffic intensity resulted in fishing campaign being displaced out of the traffic lanes, basically spreading out, whereas halving the coefficient led to an increase in bode campaign into the dealings lanes, most notably 29F0A, 29F0B and 29F0C. Changes in expected fuel cost did not result in bombastic significant differences in probabilities of web site choice. When fuel prices are halved fishers move closer in shore to the English ports, in contrast when they are double over fishers move to areas offshore where the concentration of fishers and expected vpue is at its highest ( e.g. areas, 29F0B, 29F0C and 29F0D ) or nearer to french land ports, resulting in a ‘ complimentary effect ’ with expected costs and expected vpue ( Fig. 4 ) .

• PPT PowerPoint slide
• PNG larger prototype
• bicker master prototype

download :

Figure 4.

Changes in probabilities when halving or doubling each varying in line to the benchmark model ’ s observed variable intend values. hypertext transfer protocol : //doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116335.g004

Discussion

It is widely recognised that decision-makers and managers desire an ecosystem-based approach to address complect drivers of social wellbeing [ 46 ]. Marine Spatial Planning necessitating the balance of multiple objectives ; fisheries managers need to understand the implications of campaign supplanting from closing an area and the unanticipated consequences of their management actions ( e.g. effects on other marine life, economic implications and effects on other maritime sectors ). respective authors have stressed the importance of anticipating fisher demeanor in response to management regulation, in order to reduce implementation erroneousness [ 47 ] – [ 49 ]. here, a mix logit RUM was applied at fine-scale resolution to assess the key determinants of scallop fisher behavior in the easterly English Channel, so that if a regulation or newfangled bodily process emerges, fishing effort re-allocation can potentially be predicted .
A key witness was that past fishing success in a placement within the previous month was a good forecaster of continue fishing in that placement. This can be interpreted as a proxy for habit, cognition or experience, as in other studies [ 40 ], [ 10 ]. similarly, the expect borderline web tax income of visiting one fish site preferably than another, in terms of vpue, was meaning as expected [ 50 ]. This is more apparent for the vpue in the previous calendar month, rather than in the same month the year before, potentially capturing either seasonality or more probable short-run temporal correlations in neckcloth abundance ( see Table 2 ). surprisingly, perceived fuel costs were not a major driver in option of fishing grounds, possibly because of the proximity of grounds to landing ports in the eastern English Channel. The French12-mile limit and english 6 mile limit unsurprisingly had veto influences on fisherman site choice, possibly because of productive fish grounds within limits, which are rendered unavailable to the cutlet vessels. Nevertheless rival from the inshore national evanesce could become an offspring if the flit is forced to occupy a reduce spatial geographic footprint than was previously the encase, for model by spatial closures. Of further policy importance are the effects of early commercial maritime activities ( e.g. enchant, aggregates mining ) on the behavior of the cutlet fleet. If interactions with these sectors are better characterised then the implications for the scallop evanesce of other nautical sectors can be assessed in advance .
The analysis indicates that this fleet exhibits some hazardous demeanor in their responses, as the beggarly of the coefficients determining site choice and the estimated standard deviation of the coefficients in table 2 testify highly significant estimates of some of the drivers, suggesting that the parameters vary within the wider population of fishers [ 40 ]. The signs of the standard deviations in some instances are negative, but for estimate purposes they are spare to take any sign, because the normal distribution is harmonious around its mean, and the absolute value can be taken to estimate the variation. For the coefficients that do vary between fishers ( i.e. previous feat ( last calendar month and concluding year ) and presence of aggregate extraction ) we can assess what proportion of the population of fishers see these factors as convinced or negative when making decisions about locate choice. Taking the base and standard deviation together the point estimates of the coefficients can be calculated by standardising the scores ( z scores ) and therefore a probability can be calculated. The model suggests that 88 % of the population of fishers see feat in the past calendar month as a positive inducement to fishing in the lapp location again and 12 % see it as a veto incentive, which will be subject on the clock they spent in the placement previously and their success in terms removing the harvestable biomass, if they ‘ fished out ’ an area they are improbable to return. Similarly past campaign in the like month of the previous year is a positive influence on location choice for 58 % of fishers. The areas occupied by aggregates mining are chosen more than expected with approximately 40 % preferring fishing in these areas, in line to the other 60 % seeing it as a negative influence, confirming the assumption that the aggregate diligence does impact scallop fishing. [ 15 ] found that by setting aside marine areas for aggregates mining, this resulted in reduce fishing attempt. Since 2005, aggregate origin licences have been granted over large areas [ 51 ]. This is reverse to [ 52 ] findings for sole, which suggests that sum mining can have a positive consequence on the catchability of lone by balance beam trawlers and hence on profitableness. possibly, increased turbidity increases sole catchability ( by reducing ocular cues for elude and/or fish being disturbed from the ocean floor ) or the dispersion of food into the urine column encourages sole to move away from the bottom to feed or they may favour the previously mined area because of changed food resources or substrate. In blunt contrast however, a recent report by [ 53 ] using fourth dimension series cross correlation coefficient approach path concluded that aggregate extraction activeness, proximity and saturation didn ’ t have any impact on fisherman activity. The differences could be attributed to the different statistical approaches employed. In the set about adopted by [ 53 ], merely one sector of action was investigated, in contrast to this study whereby two competing sectors were studied with the inclusion body of economic data. ARIMA models ( such as those employed by [ 53 ] ) do not take account of individual behavioral interactions and are strictly based on past time series behavior, however they remain an excellent tool to support technical opinion .
The ship Traffic Separation Scheme ( TSS ) in the English Channel controls one of the busiest ship lanes in the world and attempts to mitigate against the possibility of maritime accidents, but can besides impede fish. The output from the model suggests that the presence of a TSS importantly reduces the probability of a fisher choosing a placement, suggesting that the policy is having the hope consequence of separating fishing from other activities, though at the cost of reduce ability to choose areas of electric potential high profitableness .
This study gives clues to policy makers about the probably affect of their actions on fisher behavior. For example, an increase in traffic densities would have a high find of displacing campaign to local inshore waters ( Fig. 4 ). conversely, the fleet responds to higher fuel cost by going far offshore with the expectation of the reward of higher returns, and when costs are lower they fish equally between inshore and offshore locations as they are not forced to cover higher costs by fishing in areas with highest vpues. Fig. 4 suggests that when aggregate mining is doubled there is a greater increase in fishing action offshore and when halved there appears to be movement of fishing into the location of extraction. besides of eminence is the bowel movement of vessels towards the french 12 sea mile limit, resulting in short distances to land to french ports .
A promote important observation is that if one of the parameters that disadvantages fishers ’ ( e.g. shipping dealings densities ) is altered, the competition for space efficaciously increases and the fishery spreads out. This may be because the traffic lanes are dwelling to the best scallop fishing grounds and the specific localization a vessel relocates to is the one with the next best tradeoff between expected catch rates and distance to landing ports. This is besides apparent for the rival with the aggregate sites, which are located in the heart of good scallop fishing grounds. Any reduction of the space taken up by aggregate mine, specially inshore results in an increase in attempt allotment to those locations. This “ fish for outer space ” where observed, could be viewed as symptomatic of contest within the fleet vitamin a well as a response to other sectors, and hence this could be used as a steer measure of spatial conflicts .

Conclusions and Future Work

The Eastern English Channel is a shared resource and there is increasing competition for space and resources, requiring novel management approaches that account for all or some of the interactions between sectors. To our cognition, no other survey has used a mix RUM at very well settlement to assess key determinants of human behavior in relation to different nautical sectors and as a possible tool for MSP. The results are promising and lay the foundations for future sour that could include adding Marine Conservation Zones ( MCZs ) to the model. final decisions on where MCZs will be introduced in the English Channel and what activities will be excluded are still to be clarified or have only recently been resolved, so it was not appropriate to incorporate simulate closures into the model. Nevertheless, the border on taken could be applied to other fleets, as RUMs offer the capacity to model individual behavior at fine spatial and worldly scales needed for assessing the implications of policy decisions [ 54 ]. It would besides be desirable to re-fit the datum to holocene data where fishing effort is more stable ( during the investigate fourth dimension menstruation attempt gradually increased ) and as such results could appear slightly different. Further work might include the Scottish fleet which represent a large proportion of scallop fishing feat in the easterly English Channel, evaluating trade-offs with both socio-economic and conservation objectives using effective and effective spatial plan tools such as Marxan and MinPatch .

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received financing from the European Union ’ s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and presentation ( FP7/2007–2013 ) within the Ocean of Tomorrow call under Grant Agreement No.266445 for the project Vectors of Change in Oceans and Seas Marine Life, Impact on Economic Sectors “ ( VECTORS ) ” and time under Cefas sign ( Seedcorn 67100G ). We thank Andy Payne and Jim Ellis ( Cefas ) for their constructive advice and inputs to the work and newspaper, the UK ’ s Department of Energy and Climate Change ( DECC ) for providing data on fuel price, Royal Haskoning for supplying the commercial aggregate data and the Marine Coastguard Agency ( MCA ) for the AIS nautical traffic data. The newspaper is a contribution to Imperial College ’ second Grand Challenges in Ecosystems and the Environment first step .

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments : AT PM YV. Performed the experiments : AT PM YV. Analyzed the data : AT YV. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools : AT YV. Wrote the paper : AT JB JP EJMG .

References

1. 1 .EC (2008) Communication from the Commission: Roadmap for Maritime Spatial Planning: Achieving Common Principles in the EU. Brussels, 25.11.2008, COM(2008) 791 final.
2. 2 .EC (2007) “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions”, An Integrated Maritime Policy for the European Union, COM (2007) 575 final, Brussels, 10.10.2007.
3. 3 .EC (2008) Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Marine Environmental Policy. Official Journal L 164, 25/06/2008. P. 0019–0040. pmid:22494853
4. 4 .Kraus G, Pelletier D, Dubreuil J, Möllmann C, Hinrichsen HH, et al. (2009) A model-based evaluation of Marine Protected Areas: the example of eastern Baltic cod (Gadus morhua callarias L.). ICES Journal of Marine Science 66: 109–121.
5. 5 .Bastardie F, Vinther M, Nielsen JR, Ulrich C, Storr-Paulsen M (2010) Stock-based vs. fleet-based evaluation of the multi-annual management plan for the cod stocks in the Baltic Sea. Fisheries Research 101: 188−202.
6. 6 .NSRAC (2005) The Fisheries Secretariat 05/13/2005: North Sea RAC discusses spatial planning.
7. 7 .Degnbol P, Wilson DC (2008) Spatial planning on the North Sea: a case of cross-scale linkages. Marine Policy 32: 189–200.
8. 8 .Peterman RM (2004) Possible solutions to some challenges facing fisheries scientists and managers. ICES Journal of Marine Science 61: 1331–1343.
9. 9 .Smith CL, McKelvey R (1986) Specialist and generalist roles for coping with variability. North American Journal of Fishery Management 6: 88–99.
10. 10 .Salas S, Gaertner D (2004) The behavioural dynamics of fishers: management implications. Fish and Fisheries 5: 153–167.
11. 11 .Vermard Y, Marchal P, Mahévas S, Thébaud O (2008). A dynamics model of the Bay of Biscay pelagic fleet simulating fishing trip choice: the response to the closure of the European anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) fishery in 2005. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 65: 2444−2453.
12. 12 .Andersen BS, Vermard Y, Ulrich C, Hutton T, Poos JJ (2010) Challenges in integrating short-term behaviour in a mixed-fishery Management Strategies Evaluation frame: a case study of the North Sea flatfish fishery. Fisheries Research 102: 26−40.
13. 13 .Tidd AN, Hutton T, Kell LT, Blanchard JL (2012) Dynamic prediction of effort re-allocation in mixed fisheries. Fisheries Research 125/126: 243−253.
14. 14 .Coglan L, Pascoe S, Mardle S, Hutton T (2004) An analysis of the characteristics of fishers and their behaviour strategies following area closures. In: Matsuda et al., editors. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade (IIFET), 26−29 July 2004. (CD-Rom).
15. 15 .Cooper KM (2005) Cumulative effects of marine aggregate extraction in an area east of the Isle of Wight. A fishing industry perspective. Science Series Technical Report, CEFAS Lowestoft, 126: 28pp. Available: http://www.cefas.co.uk/publications/techrep/tech126.pdf. Accessed 2014 June 13.
16. 16 .Pawson MG (1995) Biogeographical identifcation of English Channel fish and shellfish stocks. MAFF Fisheries Research Technical Report 99. CEFAS, Lowestoft, 72 pp.
17. 17 .EC (1992) Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora. Official Journal L 206.
18. 18 .Marine Management Organisation (2012) UK Sea Fisheries Statistics 2012.
19. 19 .Defra (2011) Consultation on a new evidence based for a proposed new English scallop order. London: Defra.
20. 20 .Radford L (2013) UK Sea Fisheries Statistics 2012. Page 182. London.
21. 21 .Dobby H, Millar S, Blackadder L, Turriff J, McLay A (2012) Scottish Scallop Stocks: Results of 2011 Stock Assessments. Marine Science Scotland, Edinburgh. 158pp.
22. 22 .Mangi SC, Rodwell RD, Hattam C (2011) Assessing the impacts of establishing MPAs on fishermen and fish merchants: the case of Lyme Bay, UK. AMBIO 40: 457. pmid:21848135
23. 23 .Howell TRW, Davis SEB, Donald J, Dobby H, Tuck I, et al (2006) Report of Marine Laboratory Scallop Stock Assessments. Report No. 08/06, Fisheries Research Services.
24. 24 .EC (2000) Data Collection Regulation (EC 1543/2000) Official Journal L 176, 15/07/2000. P. 0001–0016.
25. 25 .EC (2003) Directive No. 2244/2003 Laying down detailed provisions regarding satellite-based vessel monitoring systems. Official Journal of the European Union 2003, L333: 17−27.
26. 26 .EC (2009) Council Regulation (EC) No. 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy. Official Journal of the European Union 2009; L 343/1.
27. 27 .Mills CM, Townsend SE, Jennings S, Eastwood PD, Houghton CA (2007) Estimating high resolution trawl fishing effort from satellite based vessel monitoring system data. ICES Journal of Marine Science 64: 248−255.
28. 28 .Lee J, South AB, Jennings S (2010) Developing reliable, repeatable, and accessible methods to provide high-resolution estimates of fishing-effort distributions from vessel monitoring system (VMS) data. ICES Journal of Marine Science 67: 1260–1271.
29. 29 .Hintzen NT, Bastardie F, Beare D, Piet GJ, Ulrich C, et al. (2012) VMStools: open-source software for the processing, analysis and visualisation of fisheries logbook and VMS data. Fisheries Research 115/116: 31–43.
30. 30 .McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In:Zarembka P, editor. Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 105–142.
31. 31 .McFadden D (1981) Econometric models of probabilistic choice. In:Manski CF, McFadden D, editors. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometrics Applications. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. pp. 198–272.
32. 32 .Hensher DA, Greene WH (2003) The mixed logit model: the state of practice. Transportation 30: 133–176.
33. 33 .Train K (2003) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
34. 34 .Maddala GS (1983) Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Econometric Society Monograph, 3. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. 35 .SAS Institute Inc (1999) SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 8, Cary, NC.
36. 36 .Gillis DM, Peterman RM, Tyler AV (1993) Movement dynamics in a fishery: application of the ideal free distribution to spatial allocation of effort. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50: 323–333.
37. 37 .Pet-Soede C, van Densen WLT, Hiddink JG, Kuyl S, Machiels MAM (2001) Can fishermen allocate their fishing effort in space and time on the basis of their catch rates? An example from Spermonde Archipelago, SW Sulawesi, Indonesia. Fisheries Management and Ecology 8: 15–36.
38. 38 .Berman M (2006) Modeling spatial choice in ocean fisheries. Marine Resource Economics 21(4):121–125.
39. 39 .Marchal P, Poos JJ, Quirijns F (2007) Linkage between fishers’ foraging, market and fish stocks density: examples from some North Sea fisheries. Fisheries Research 83: 33−43.
40. 40 .Holland DS, Sutinen JG (1999) An empirical model of fleet dynamics in New England trawl fisheries. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56: 253−264.
41. 41 .Robinson C, Pascoe S (1997) Fisher behaviour: exploring the validity of the profit maximizing assumption. CEMARE Research Paper 110. University of Portsmouth, UK.
42. 42 .Sinnott RW (1984) Virtues of the Haversine. Sky and Telescope 68: 159.
43. 43 .Abernethy KE, Trebilcock P, Kebede B, Allison EH, Dulvy NK (2010) Fuelling the decline in UK fishing communities? ICES Journal of Marine Science 67: 1076–1085.
44. 44 .McFadden D (1979) Quantitative methods for analysing travel behaviour of individuals:some recent developments. In: Hensher D, Stopher P, editors. Behavioural Travel Modelling. London: Croom Helm. pp. 279–318.
45. 45 .Domenech T, Mcfadden DL (1975) Urban travel demand: A behavioral analysis, with T. Domencich, North Holland: Amsterdam, 1975. Reprinted by The Blackstone Company: Mount Pleasant, MI, 1996.
46. 46 .FAO (2003) Fisheries management. The ecosystem approach to fisheries. FAO Technical Guidelines for Responsible Fisheries 4, Suppl. 2: 112 pp.
47. 47 .Dugan JE, Davis GE (1993) Applications of marine refugia to coastal fisheries management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50: 2029–2042.
48. 48 .Allison GW, Lubchenco J, Carr MH (1998) Marine reserves are necessary but not sufficient for marine conservation. Ecological Applications 8: 79–92.
49. 49 .Fulton EA, Smith ADM, Smith DC, van Putten IE (2011) Human behaviour: the key source of uncertainty in fisheries management. Fish and Fisheries 12: 2–17.
50. 50 .Ran T, Keithly WR, Kazmierczak RF (2011) Location choice behavior of Gulf of Mexico shrimpers under dynamic economic conditions. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 43: 29–42.
51. 51 .Vanstaen K, Limpenny D, Lee J, Eggleton J, Brown A, Stelzenmüller V (2007) The scale and impact of fishing activities in the eastern English Channel: an initial assessment based on existing geophysical survey data. CEFAS, Lowestoft.
52. 52 .Desprez M, Lafite R (2012) Suivi des impacts de l’extraction de granulats marins. Synthèse des connaissances, 2012 (GIS SIEGMA).Editions PURH, Université de Rouen, 43 pp.
53. 53.

    Read more: How Maritime Law Works

    Marchal P, Desprez M, Vermard Y, Tidd AN (2014) How do demersal fishing fleets interact with aggregate extraction in a congested sea? Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 149: 168–177.

54. 54 .Smith MD (2002) Two econometric approaches for predicting the spatial behavior of renewable resource harvesters. Land Economics 78: 522–538.
55. 55 .Train K (1998) Recreation demand models with taste differences over people. Land Economics 74: 230–239.